Dear Jorge,
You wrote:-
"A recent letter written to the editor in USA TODAY. It rather well summarizes how Evolutionists regard the “moderate Christian” who believe that God and Evolution are compatible."
Well I am a hardcore evolutionist,* and I think that moderate Christians, and conservative Christians who accept the theory of evolution are perfectly sensible. I disagree with their theology, but I think their acceptance of evolution is eminently sensible. I know many others like me.
So you got something wrong.
I also think that creationists who, despite what the KJV says, reject the idea that rainfall is a supernatural phenomenon in direct cause, but rather accept that it is a natural phenomenon in direct cause, are also being sensible. I also think that creationists who reject the idea of a flat circular earth, despite strong hints of it in the Bible, are also being very sensible. And so it is with geocentrism as well.
"“God did it” can explain anything, and hence explains nothing. Supernatural explanations don’t improve science, They impede it."
I agree. But folk are still allowed to see scientific theories in terms of God, just like you do. They are allowed to see them in terms of no God, just like I do.
As long as we don't bring our theologies into science, like you try to do, then ....
Regards, Roland
* I watch it every night.
You wrote:-
"A recent letter written to the editor in USA TODAY. It rather well summarizes how Evolutionists regard the “moderate Christian” who believe that God and Evolution are compatible."
Well I am a hardcore evolutionist,* and I think that moderate Christians, and conservative Christians who accept the theory of evolution are perfectly sensible. I disagree with their theology, but I think their acceptance of evolution is eminently sensible. I know many others like me.
So you got something wrong.
I also think that creationists who, despite what the KJV says, reject the idea that rainfall is a supernatural phenomenon in direct cause, but rather accept that it is a natural phenomenon in direct cause, are also being sensible. I also think that creationists who reject the idea of a flat circular earth, despite strong hints of it in the Bible, are also being very sensible. And so it is with geocentrism as well.
"“God did it” can explain anything, and hence explains nothing. Supernatural explanations don’t improve science, They impede it."
I agree. But folk are still allowed to see scientific theories in terms of God, just like you do. They are allowed to see them in terms of no God, just like I do.
As long as we don't bring our theologies into science, like you try to do, then ....
Regards, Roland
* I watch it every night.
Comment