Even Atheists Think That Atheists Are More Immoral.

[JimL]

Sin is rebellion against God.

And like I said, sin is not a thing in itself. Rebellion is simply a human action freely chosen, which of course would have been the innate nature of human beings whether Adam and Eve chose to rebel or not. The metaphorical sin was not the rebellion against god, the metaphorical sin was in becoming knowledgeable in a certain sense.

[Sparko]

And like I said, sin is not a thing in itself. Rebellion is simply a human action freely chosen, which of course would have been the innate nature of human beings whether Adam and Eve chose to rebel or not. The metaphorical sin was not the rebellion against god, the metaphorical sin was in becoming knowledgeable in a certain sense.

Man you are dense.

It is not a physical object, but it is a thing. Love is a thing. Hate is a thing. Murder is a thing. Sin is a thing.

[JimL]

Man you are dense.

It is not a physical object, but it is a thing. Love is a thing. Hate is a thing. Murder is a thing. Sin is a thing.

Learn to read before calling others dense. What I said is that sin is not a thing in itself.

[Sparko]

Learn to read before calling others dense. What I said is that sin is not a thing in itself.

It is a category of actions. Rebellion against God. Evil. Imperfection. Missing the Mark. a flaw in creation.

If you have a perfect sheet of glass and a crack starts in it, you can say when the crack entered into the glass it ruined the glass. Sin is the crack in Creation.

[Charles]

No it doesn't.

Have you heard about "evidence"? If so could you provide any?

[Sparko]

Have you heard about "evidence"? If so could you provide any?

Tassy is the one who needs to provide evidence. Darth merely disagreed with his claim.

Your nanny-sniping is getting a bit old.

[Charles]

Tassy is the one who needs to provide evidence. Darth merely disagreed with his claim.

Your nanny-sniping is getting a bit old.

Why would Darth not give us the evidence if he had it. Is there anything better than actually proving someone wrong providing the evidence?

[Sparko]

Why would Darth not give us the evidence if he had it. Is there anything better than actually proving someone wrong providing the evidence?

[Darth Executor]

"Science tells us that Adam and Eve are fictions. That Saint Paul or Uncle Tom Cobley and all thought otherwise is irrelevant. They were wrong."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_874982.html

lol huffington post

nevermind that it is only a rebuttal to the YEC interpretation of Adam and Eve. I am not a young earth creationist.

[Darth Executor]

Why would Darth not give us the evidence if he had it. Is there anything better than actually proving someone wrong providing the evidence?

You are asking for "evidence" because you assume (erroneously, like Tassman, because you have a low IQ and no imagination) that I am a YEC.

I don't dispute the genetic record so there is no evidence for me to provide. I dispute your interpretation of what I should think (which is identical to the YECs, you just want to use it as a weapon against Christians).

[Charles]

Oh, no answer to that one either...

[Sparko]

yip. Yip. Yip.

fify

[Charles]

fify

And another one without anything of substance.

[Sparko]

And another one without anything of substance.

Thank you for your virtuous nannying. What would we do without you?

[Charles]

Thank you for your virtuous nannying. What would we do without you?

And again. I am just making it obvious that your method is to only attack and provide nothing of substance. I will continue to point to this.