"They received not the love of The Truth"! (2Thes2:10)

[Pilgrm&Stranger]

And those who have not received "a love of The Truth", liken unto Pilate, yet question "What is Truth?"

Sadly )-; there are those who believe they have "received a love of The Truth", yet have not, for they are bound in the chains of strong delusion that is 'religion'!

So it is that they will deny this testimony, and remain captivated by the LIE that is religion's way )-;

Yet while while breath is, Hope is they would yet experience The Miracle that is receiving "a love of The Truth".

As for those who have "received a love of The Truth", those who are being molded and shaped, refined and sanctified, even as they desire and seek to receive evermore of The Truth they love!

The following is for you:

Now i realize that for most, it will take quite some time before they fully receive the following testimony which bears witness unto The Truth.

Especially the babes, and those just beginning to receive of the "strong meat".

For lies have been told for so long, by so many, that the multitudes believe The LIE )-;

The following is not a persuasive argument or plea to convince or entice.

Just the facts(truth)!

And once again, i fully realize that most will reject that which follows initially, however once Truth has been manifest it can work in the hearts of those who have actually experienced The Miracle that is receiving "a love of The Truth".

That which is called the king james version, an aptly named version of the bible, will be used for reference.

Fact: The word 'iesous' In the Greek language manuscripts was transliterated, not translated, as 'jesus' in more that one hundred English language bibles.

Fact: Rightly transliterated into modern day English, 'iesous' would be 'jesous'.

Fact: 'jesus' is actually the modern day English transliteration of the pagan catholic latin 'iesus'.

Fact: The Greek word 'Iesous' was used when referring to 'Joshua' in the Greek version of the Old Testament(The Septuagint).

Fact: Three times 'Joshua' is referred to in the New Testament, each time referenced by the Greek word 'Iesous'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Only the double-minded would translate the Greek 'Iesous' as both 'Joshua' and 'jesus'.

Fact! At least the translators of the kjv were consistent and transliterated 'iesous' as 'jesus' even when such clearly referred to 'Joshua'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Truth IS that many will declare that a name is not important, and most certainly the name given them is not. Yet The Name "Our Father and GOD" gave The Messiah IS!

Fact: Truth IS ALWAYS important, for those who have received "a love of The Truth".

Fact: 'jesus' is not, was not, and never will be the correct English version of The Name given The Only Begotten Son of "Our Father and GOD"?

Fact: One must receive "a love of The Truth" to be saved! (2Thes2:10)

Fact: Father Help! and HE does.......

And no! i am not of the “sacred name” folk, nor of religion's way.......

Thankfully i am one who has experienced The Miracle that is receiving “a love of The Truth”!

So while breath is, HOPE IS! that others would also receive “a love of The Truth”.......

And TRUTH IS! Miracles do happen.......

Father Help! and HE does.......

[RBerman]

Fact: The word 'iesous' In the Greek language manuscripts was transliterated, not translated, as 'jesus' in more that one hundred English language bibles.

Fact: Rightly transliterated into modern day English, 'iesous' would be 'jesous'.
Fact: 'jesus' is actually the modern day English transliteration of the pagan catholic latin 'iesus'.
Fact: The Greek word 'Iesous' was used when referring to 'Joshua' in the Greek version of the Old Testament(The Septuagint).
Fact: Three times 'Joshua' is referred to in the New Testament, each time referenced by the Greek word 'Iesous'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)
Fact: Only the double-minded would translate the Greek 'Iesous' as both 'Joshua' and 'jesus'.
Fact! At least the translators of the kjv were consistent and transliterated 'iesous' as 'jesus' even when such clearly referred to 'Joshua'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)
Fact: Truth IS that many will declare that a name is not important, and most certainly the name given them is not. Yet The Name "Our Father and GOD" gave The Messiah IS!
Fact: 'jesus' is not, was not, and never will be the correct English version of The Name given The Only Begotten Son of "Our Father and GOD"?

Why assume the worst of translators? Perhaps they know something about linguistics that you don't. Iesous itself, for instance, is a Greek transliteration of an Aramaic word which would have been closer to Yah-Shua. The Greek language doesn't have a "SH" sound, so a simple sigma ("s") was substituted.for the Hebrew shem. The vowel sounds also were changed from the Aramaic word to the Greek word, in accordance with the conventions of the day. It's no bigger a deal than calling Elijah "Elias."

[Heterodoxus]

With few exceptions (listed below), Jesus' name in English is translated everywhere in the KJV from the Greek Ἰησους. That name is a translation (not transliteration) of the Hebrew name יהושׁוּע (Yehoshua, Jehovah-saved, or "'Jehovah is salvation,' i.e. 'is the Saviour', a common name among the Jews") and translated Joshua in English (cp. Strong's #G2424, Mounce's #2652, Vine's et al.
_________________________
Exceptions: Matt. 9:10; Mark 2:8, 16:9; Luke 7:37, 19:1; John 7:50, 9:1, 18:22.

I might respond to more inaccuracies in the OP later.

[Pilgrm&Stranger]

With few exceptions (listed below), Jesus' name in English is translated everywhere in the KJV from the Greek Ἰησους. That name is a translation (not transliteration) of the Hebrew name יהושׁוּע (Yehoshua, Jehovah-saved, or "'Jehovah is salvation,' i.e. 'is the Saviour', a common name among the Jews") and translated Joshua in English (cp. Strong's #G2424, Mounce's #2652, Vine's et al.
_________________________
Exceptions: Matt. 9:10; Mark 2:8, 16:9; Luke 7:37, 19:1; John 7:50, 9:1, 18:22.

I might respond to more inaccuracies in the OP later.

Faith IS beyond reason and defies logic!

And it seems your "response to the inaccuracies of the op" actually offer further proof that 'jesus' is but the "imag"ined name pagan catholicism and her #1 harlot christian daughter(the aptly named church OF england) gave to one head of their three headed pagan god(s) less than 600 years ago.......

And you also prove the op with your statement of " iesous" "being translated Joshua in English".......

And you continue to have your portion with the pharisee's as you seek to war against The TRUTH!

Thankfully you were already defeated when you chose to live and believe The LIE!

Fact: The Greek word 'Iesous' was used when referring to 'Joshua' in the Greek version of the Old Testament(The Septuagint).

Fact: Three times 'Joshua' is referred to in the New Testament, each time referenced by the Greek word 'Iesous'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Only the double-minded would translate the Greek 'Iesous' as both 'Joshua' and 'jesus'.

Fact! At least the translators of the kjv were consistent and transliterated 'iesous' as 'jesus' even when such clearly referred to 'Joshua'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Truth IS that many will declare that a name is not important, and most certainly the name given them, as well as The Truth, is not important to them. Yet TRUTH IS The Name "Our Father and GOD" gave The Messiah IS!

Fact: 'jesus' is not, was not, and never will be the correct English version of The Name given The Only Begotten Son of "Our Father and GOD"?

Father Help! and HE does.......

[Heterodoxus]

Any disagreement you might have, either real or imagined, with the cited information should be addressed to the author or publishers. As for your personal judgments of me . . . . . well, I'll just consider the source and ignore your unsubstantiated rants and ramblings--and you.

Have fun talking to yourself and your "Father".

[Pilgrm&Stranger]

Any disagreement you might have, either real or imagined, with the cited information should be addressed to the author or publishers. As for your personal judgments of me . . . . . well, I'll just consider the source and ignore your unsubstantiated rants and ramblings--and you.

Have fun talking to yourself and your "Father".

Simply sad for you )-;

Yet while breath IS, HOPE IS!

For TRUTH IS! Miracles do happen.......

Father Help! and HE does.......

[Sparko]

[Catholicity]

[Catholicity]

Sparko You Copy Cat

[Sparko]

Sparko You Copy Cat

apparently a psychic one who copied you two minutes before you posted.

[Catholicity]

think that all you want. I'll get you for this.

[Pilgrm&Stranger]

Faith IS beyond reason and defies logic!

And it seems your "response to the inaccuracies of the op" actually offer further proof that 'jesus' is but the "imag"ined name pagan catholicism and her #1 harlot christian daughter(the aptly named church OF england) gave to one head of their three headed pagan god(s) less than 600 years ago.......

And you also prove the op with your statement of " iesous" "being translated Joshua in English".......

And you continue to have your portion with the pharisee's as you seek to war against The TRUTH!

Thankfully you were already defeated when you chose to live and believe The LIE!

Fact: The Greek word 'Iesous' was used when referring to 'Joshua' in the Greek version of the Old Testament(The Septuagint).

Fact: Three times 'Joshua' is referred to in the New Testament, each time referenced by the Greek word 'Iesous'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Only the double-minded would translate the Greek 'Iesous' as both 'Joshua' and 'jesus'.

Fact! At least the translators of the kjv were consistent and transliterated 'iesous' as 'jesus' even when such clearly referred to 'Joshua'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Truth IS that many will declare that a name is not important, and most certainly the name given them, as well as The Truth, is not important to them. Yet TRUTH IS The Name "Our Father and GOD" gave The Messiah IS!

Fact: 'jesus' is not, was not, and never will be the correct English version of The Name given The Only Begotten Son of "Our Father and GOD"?

Father Help! and HE does.......

[Sparko]

Faith IS beyond reason and defies logic!

Well your posts certainly do.

But true faith is reasonable and logical.

[Chrawnus]

Faith IS beyond reason and defies logic!

And it seems your "response to the inaccuracies of the op" actually offer further proof that 'jesus' is but the "imag"ined name pagan catholicism and her #1 harlot christian daughter(the aptly named church OF england) gave to one head of their three headed pagan god(s) less than 600 years ago.......

And you also prove the op with your statement of " iesous" "being translated Joshua in English".......

And you continue to have your portion with the pharisee's as you seek to war against The TRUTH!

Thankfully you were already defeated when you chose to live and believe The LIE!

Fact: The Greek word 'Iesous' was used when referring to 'Joshua' in the Greek version of the Old Testament(The Septuagint).

Fact: Three times 'Joshua' is referred to in the New Testament, each time referenced by the Greek word 'Iesous'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Only the double-minded would translate the Greek 'Iesous' as both 'Joshua' and 'jesus'.

Fact! At least the translators of the kjv were consistent and transliterated 'iesous' as 'jesus' even when such clearly referred to 'Joshua'. (Acts7:45, Heb4:8, Col4:11)

Fact: Truth IS that many will declare that a name is not important, and most certainly the name given them, as well as The Truth, is not important to them. Yet TRUTH IS The Name "Our Father and GOD" gave The Messiah IS!

Fact: 'jesus' is not, was not, and never will be the correct English version of The Name given The Only Begotten Son of "Our Father and GOD"?

Father Help! and HE does.......

Fact! tl;dr

[Sparko]

Fact! tl;dr

For someone who thinks faith is beyond reason and logic, he sure posts a lot of "facts" to convince people he is right.

Ironical.