Announcement

Collapse

Deeper Waters Forum Guidelines

Notice – The ministries featured in this section of TheologyWeb are guests of this site and in some cases not bargaining for the rough and tumble world of debate forums, though sometimes they are. Additionally, this area is frequented and highlighted for guests who also very often are not acclimated to debate fora. As such, the rules of conduct here will be more strict than in the general forum. This will be something within the discretion of the Moderators and the Ministry Representative, but we simply ask that you conduct yourselves in a manner considerate of the fact that these ministries are our invited guests. You can always feel free to start a related thread in general forum without such extra restrictions. Thank you.

Deeper Waters is founded on the belief that the Christian community has long been in the shallow end of Christianity while there are treasures of the deep waiting to be discovered. Too many in the shallow end are not prepared when they go out beyond those waters and are quickly devoured by sharks. We wish to aid Christians to equip them to navigate the deeper waters of the ocean of truth and come up with treasure in the end.

We also wish to give special aid to those often neglected, that is, the disabled community. This is especially so since our founders are both on the autism spectrum and have a special desire to reach those on that spectrum. While they are a special emphasis, we seek to help others with any disability realize that God can use them and that they are as the Psalmist says, fearfully and wonderfully made.

General TheologyWeb forum rules: here.
See more
See less

Why God Is Not The Definition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why God Is Not The Definition

    Can we define goodness by looking to God?

    The link can be found here.

    ------

    If we say that God's nature is good or love, what do we mean? Let's plunge into the Deeper Waters and find out.

    Yesterday on Facebook, I saw a friend of mine post a poem that was saying what love is not, and for the most part, I agreed with it. It ended with the poet saying that God's nature is love. If you want to know what love is, look to God. That is where I begin to have disagreements.

    If you wanted to say that God is the one who acts out what love is, then that is one thing, but too often when we have conversations about goodness and love, we just refer to God's nature. What is the good? The good is God's nature. I agree that God's nature is to be good, but there is a problem with this approach.

    You see, when we speak of this, first off, we normally mean only moral goodness, but there are other types of goodness. If my wife fixes a pizza for us for dinner and I say "My, this is a good pizza." I am not saying anything about morality there. I am saying something about the quality of the pizza. If I read a book, I can say that it is a good book, but I am not saying it is a moral book.

    If I am someone who does not know what good is, how does pointing me to God tell me what it is? What am I to think of that? This is a godlike book? This is a godlike pizza? If I do not know the nature of God, how am I going to know the nature of goodness by pointing to something that I don't know?

    Many atheists also tie this in with the Euthyphro dilemma. The Liconas and Habermases regularly get together for Labor Day, so while over there yesterday, Gary and I watched Mike debate Larry Shapiro and it was quite frankly a massacre. Shapiro just did not know the subject matter at hand well enough.*

    In the talk, he presented the dilemma. Is something good because God says it is or does God say it is good because it is good? He said that no one had ever answered this question. Of course, this problem could be turned back onto whatever Shapiro thinks is good. Does society say something is good because it is, or is something good because society says it is?

    Sadly, Shapiro doesn't realize that Plato's own student Aristotle answered the dilemma. He did it in a simple way. He defined goodness. That's what we need to do. Aristotle started it simply by saying the good is that at which all things aim. There's much more to it, but it is a definition.*

    That is the proper way to answer the dilemma also. Tell what love is. Tell what goodness is. Pointing to God does nothing to those who don't know God and even if you do, it doesn't help. After all, how does knowing God's nature tell you what is meant by a good pizza?

    We should all strive to know God's nature, but let's also make sure we're conveying an accurate message. While I agree goodness and love can't exist without God, one doesn't need to know God to know what those are. We find out what they are and then that helps us understand God better.

    In Christ,
    Nick Peters

  • #2
    I had this problem when dealing with the Euthrypo Dilemma recently. I knew God was good and that goodness came from God, but I could not describe what goodness wasake except that it was intrinsically part of God and that we could recognize it by our conscience. How simple this definition of moral goodness you have taught me. What we all need to be.
    sigpic

    Comment

    Related Threads

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-15-2024, 10:19 PM
    14 responses
    75 views
    1 like
    Last Post rogue06
    by rogue06
     
    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-13-2024, 10:13 PM
    6 responses
    61 views
    0 likes
    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-12-2024, 09:36 PM
    1 response
    23 views
    0 likes
    Last Post rogue06
    by rogue06
     
    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-11-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    22 views
    2 likes
    Last Post Apologiaphoenix  
    Started by Apologiaphoenix, 03-08-2024, 11:59 AM
    7 responses
    57 views
    0 likes
    Last Post whag
    by whag
     
    Working...
    X