Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Junior's meeting with Russian lawyer: no smoking gun
Collapse
X
-
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostAnd how the mighty have fallen. The Times used to have only about one major retraction "scandal" a year which is pretty good for a newspaper but since Trump that rate is now more like once a month. The latest that I can immediately recall was having to correct not one, or even two misquotes of Trump, but five wrt what he said about Charlottesville.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostBecause Mueller's investigation is not yet completed, as you yourself acknowledge above. But it seems to be gathering apace.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View Post
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postif they had enough evidence they would charge him. No need to continue the investigation other than to add more charges.
Whether they have a lot of evidence or haven't found any real evidence, there's little reason to jump the gun on bringing charges. I think the main reason to want to charge someone early is if you're worried they might run off in the meantime and you'd be unable to take them into custody as a result, which seems kinda unlikely in this case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postoh, how professional of them. Yes, that really proves how unbiased they are, calling figures of speech, generalizations and out of context words, "lies" and then keeping a running total of them. Yep, very unbiased and professional.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostSo Trump's birtherism, which he promoted for years, was just a "figure of speech", "out of context words" and a "generalisation". Gotcha!...>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postoh, how professional of them. Yes, that really proves how unbiased they are, calling figures of speech, generalizations and out of context words, "lies" and then keeping a running total of them. Yep, very unbiased and professional.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...s.html?mcubz=3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassmoron View PostYes I read it and I suggest that you re-read it. It is a comprehensive list of Trump lies or, if you prefer Kellyanne Conway's take on his lies: "Alternate facts".
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...s.html?mcubz=3Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Yesterday, 11:06 AM
|
3 responses
109 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sam
Yesterday, 05:00 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 07:03 AM
|
16 responses
93 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 02:40 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
|
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 11:43 AM
|
219 responses
887 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 09:34 AM
|
Comment