George Bush view of Trump

[Cow Poke]

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...an-troll-house

Hillary didn't need a Russian "troll factory" to discredit her. She was really good at that all by herself.

[Mountain Man]

This didn't come from any "troll factory", it comes from the FBI who was investigating Hillary's State Department since at least 2009, long before Trump was even on the political scene.

Source: The Hill

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...administration

© Copyright Original Source

[Tassman]

This didn't come from any "troll factory", it comes from the FBI who was investigating Hillary's State Department since at least 2009, long before Trump was even on the political scene.

Source: The Hill

http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...administration

© Copyright Original Source

Yeah, yeah, yeah!

And then there was Clinton and her Campaign Chairman John Podesta operating a child sex trafficking ring out of a Washington Pizza Parlour basement. I take all these conspiracy theories against Hillary with a grain of salt.

[Cow Poke]

Yeah, yeah, yeah!

And then there was Clinton and her Campaign Chairman John Podesta operating a child sex trafficking ring out of a Washington Pizza Parlour basement. I take all these conspiracy theories against Hillary with a grain of salt.

But any conspiracy theories against Trump, no matter how unsubstantiated, are taken by you as absolute indisputable fact. What a freakin' hypocrite.

[Mountain Man]

Yeah, yeah, yeah!

And then there was Clinton and her Campaign Chairman John Podesta operating a child sex trafficking ring out of a Washington Pizza Parlour basement. I take all these conspiracy theories against Hillary with a grain of salt.

Careful with that straw. It's highly flammable.

[JimL]

Well, no, I didn't, and I'm confident that most of "us" didn't either. I was somewhat more supportive of GWB than Trump, but that's a rather low bar.

Well, yes, you did, and I'm confident that most of "y'all" did as well. Y'all may have been somewhat more supportive of GWB than Trump, but yes, they are both a rather low bar.

[JimL]

But any conspiracy theories against Trump, no matter how unsubstantiated, are taken by you as absolute indisputable fact. What a freakin' hypocrite.

No, actually we are able, unlike yourself, to distinguish between fake news, propaganda, and actual evidence of immoral character and wrong doing. If for some odd reason we on the Democrat side of the aisle had accidentally elected an autocratic, moral reprobate, wannabee dictator, we wouldn't be defending him at every turn. Obviously, you and yours would, and do.

[RumTumTugger]

No, actually we are able, unlike yourself, to distinguish between fake news, propaganda, and actual evidence of immoral character and wrong doing. If for some odd reason we on the Democrat side of the aisle had accidentally elected an autocratic, moral reprobate, wannabee dictator, we wouldn't be defending him at every turn. Obviously, you and yours would, and do.

yeah right JimL you defended Obama. please try not show how much of a hypocrite you are.

[One Bad Pig]

Well, yes, you did,

Prove it. I'm certain you can't. You're flailing, again.

[JimL]

yeah right JimL you defended Obama. please try not show how much of a hypocrite you are.

Of course I did, because Obama was nothing like the disgusting human being that your hero Trump is. Don't be so stupid RTT, open your eyes.

[Tassman]

But any conspiracy theories against Trump, no matter how unsubstantiated, are taken by you as absolute indisputable fact. What a freakin' hypocrite.

[Cow Poke]

No, actually we are able, unlike yourself, to distinguish between fake news.....

You guys CONSTANTLY get suckered into fake news -- like the whole "hands up don't shoot" thing. You STILL buy that.

[Sparko]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...k-records.html

[Cow Poke]

You guys CONSTANTLY get suckered into fake news -- like the whole "hands up don't shoot" thing. You STILL buy that.

My apologies to PM who is man enough to state....

I know that hands up don't shoot refers to something specific that didn't happen.

[JimL]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017...k-records.html

What difference does that make. Thats just Nunes who has already shown himself to be in cahoots with the White House in their attempt to stifle the investigation. Don't forget that Nunes was on the Trump transition team and is probably desperately trying to protect himself rather than seeking the truth. All that matters is whether or not the dossier, which contrary to your characterization of it, has not been discredited, is true, not who paid for it.