Of course, there is no evidence - in quantity or quality - that will convince the Evo-Faithful that their "billions of years" are maintained at all costs to make their ideology possible. In other words, eliminate those billions of years and Evolution goes out the door.
For that goal the Evo-Faithful will forever deny any evidence for a "young" creation. They will yell until blue in the face that "no evidence exists supporting a young creation". This is in spite of the scores of published articles detailing such evidences - articles that I have provided over the years.
Here is yet another "non-existent evidence" that was published recently. What the Evo-Faithful usually do is come up with something - anything! - that dismisses the evidence so that they can hold on to their sacred beliefs. Oh well, there is nothing that can be done about that -- fanatical willful ignorance is unconquerable.
https://creation.com/surprising-lizards-in-amber
From the article:
"Unfortunately, however, the recent reporting of a research study on 38 fossil lizards in amber found on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola has not regarded this. Instead, coming from an evolutionary perspective that posits these amber fossils as being 20 million years old, the researchers were amazed and surprised to find exquisitely preserved anole lizards, which showed no evolution. For these reptilian specimens in amber are “identical to their modern cousins” and show “phenomenal detail—including the colour of the lizard … and whether its eyes were open or shut.” In the words of lead researcher Dr Emma Sherratt, of the University of New England, Australia:
“These fossils were really surprising because of how much detail they contained, allowing us to see how these lizards would have looked in real life. Most of ours had full skeletons, and details of the skin were impressed on the amber, providing very detailed images of tiny scales on the body and on the sticky toe pads. You could have taken a lizard today, embedded it in resin and it would have looked like one of these creatures. That’s how realistic and modern they look.”
Sherratt describes such stasis (i.e. that these lizards haven’t changed evolutionarily in the mooted 20 million years “over which all the main animal types evolved”) as “very striking” and “quite surprising”."
"amazed" ... "surprised" ... "very striking" ... "quite surprising"? Really? NOT TO ME! The rather obvious possibility that "Hmmm ... perhaps these fossils are NOT 20 million years old" doesn't even cross their poor, pathetic, brainwashed minds. They have become blinded by a fanatical adherence to "the only possibility" - millions and billions of years.
"No evidence" here, folks ... move along.
See ya'll next year. Information theory coming along fine.
Jorge
For that goal the Evo-Faithful will forever deny any evidence for a "young" creation. They will yell until blue in the face that "no evidence exists supporting a young creation". This is in spite of the scores of published articles detailing such evidences - articles that I have provided over the years.
Here is yet another "non-existent evidence" that was published recently. What the Evo-Faithful usually do is come up with something - anything! - that dismisses the evidence so that they can hold on to their sacred beliefs. Oh well, there is nothing that can be done about that -- fanatical willful ignorance is unconquerable.
https://creation.com/surprising-lizards-in-amber
From the article:
"Unfortunately, however, the recent reporting of a research study on 38 fossil lizards in amber found on the Caribbean island of Hispaniola has not regarded this. Instead, coming from an evolutionary perspective that posits these amber fossils as being 20 million years old, the researchers were amazed and surprised to find exquisitely preserved anole lizards, which showed no evolution. For these reptilian specimens in amber are “identical to their modern cousins” and show “phenomenal detail—including the colour of the lizard … and whether its eyes were open or shut.” In the words of lead researcher Dr Emma Sherratt, of the University of New England, Australia:
“These fossils were really surprising because of how much detail they contained, allowing us to see how these lizards would have looked in real life. Most of ours had full skeletons, and details of the skin were impressed on the amber, providing very detailed images of tiny scales on the body and on the sticky toe pads. You could have taken a lizard today, embedded it in resin and it would have looked like one of these creatures. That’s how realistic and modern they look.”
Sherratt describes such stasis (i.e. that these lizards haven’t changed evolutionarily in the mooted 20 million years “over which all the main animal types evolved”) as “very striking” and “quite surprising”."
"amazed" ... "surprised" ... "very striking" ... "quite surprising"? Really? NOT TO ME! The rather obvious possibility that "Hmmm ... perhaps these fossils are NOT 20 million years old" doesn't even cross their poor, pathetic, brainwashed minds. They have become blinded by a fanatical adherence to "the only possibility" - millions and billions of years.
"No evidence" here, folks ... move along.
See ya'll next year. Information theory coming along fine.
Jorge
Comment