Civil War: DNC

[demi-conservative]

Clinton/DNC scandals

1) Clinton and DNC paid for 'Russian dossier'
2) Clinton bought over DNC, officials of DNC allowed it to happen.

What will we find out next? Stay tuned for Civil War: DNC!

[Cow Poke]

Yeah, I done it again - meant to report this post as being "part II" of DNC Civil war, but amen'd it instead.

We need an UN-amen button just for me.

[EvoUK]

The irony there is that Hillary spent over twice as much as Trump did during the race. According to CNBC, Trump spent more than $859,538 per electoral vote in his favor, Clinton $2,070,000

[JimL]

The irony there is that Hillary spent over twice as much as Trump did during the race. According to CNBC, Trump spent more than $859,538 per electoral vote in his favor, Clinton $2,070,000

Trump didn't need to spend it, he had all the help he needed to win from Russia.

[EvoUK]

Trump didn't need to spend it, he had all the help he needed to win from Russia.

[Cow Poke]

And the fact that, in spite of her opponent being such a scumbag reprobate, Hillary still lost, says a lot about her. Why, she should have won by AT LEAST 50 POINTS!

[Cow Poke]

Trump didn't need to spend it, he had all the help he needed to win from Russia.

Did you ever think that maybe Hillary got what she deserved for cheating Bernie Sanders out of any chance of winning?

[One Bad Pig]

I get the impression that whatever fake news was peddled, it was mostly swallowed by those ready to believe it - iow, I'm not convinced it changed many votes. I was under the impression that most of it came too late to influence the election, but last I heard FB et al. had many more fake accounts than they'd let on earlier. Given FB's obvious partisan stance, I'm surprised something like that would not have come out sooner.

[EvoUK]

And the fact that, in spite of her opponent being such a scumbag reprobate, Hillary still lost, says a lot about her. Why, she should have won by AT LEAST 50 POINTS!

I never defended her, nor have I, if I remember correctly. That she lost to trump is a huge embarrassment. This election more than most seemed to be voting against the other guy.

[JimL]

I get the impression that whatever fake news was peddled, it was mostly swallowed by those ready to believe it - iow, I'm not convinced it changed many votes. I was under the impression that most of it came too late to influence the election, but last I heard FB et al. had many more fake accounts than they'd let on earlier. Given FB's obvious partisan stance, I'm surprised something like that would not have come out sooner.

Not necessarily, propaganda works, thats why its utilized.

[Mountain Man]

I get the impression that whatever fake news was peddled, it was mostly swallowed by those ready to believe it...

Also known as low-information voters, a.k.a. Hillary supporters.

[One Bad Pig]

Not necessarily, propaganda works, thats why its utilized.

Propaganda works because it's the only easily available source of information and cannot be shown to be false. Propaganda fails when it is readily shown to be false and/or there is another more believable source of information available; it cannot handle competition.

[demi-conservative]

Donna Brazile's book sounds like big hoot!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.e59dbf9c6741

Savage!

[Darth Executor]

Lol someone did die (and I don't just mean Clinton's dignity).

hillary_sick_ben_garrison.jpg

[hedrick]

The DNC made a judgement that Sanders was too extreme to win. I think there was a good basis for that, though in light of today's politics, I think they might well have been wrong. Still, they were trying to come up with the best candidate.