Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Did Comey obstruct justice by protecting Hillary Clinton from prosecution?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Did Comey obstruct justice by protecting Hillary Clinton from prosecution?

    Did Comey obstruct justice by protecting Hillary Clinton from prosecution?

    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2
    Gross negligence is totally against the law, but extreme carelessness is no biggie. Sounds legit.
    I DENOUNCE DONALD J. TRUMP AND ALL HIS IMMORAL ACTS.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Zymologist View Post
      Gross negligence is totally against the law, but extreme carelessness is no biggie. Sounds legit.
      From the article....

      Either Comey is not well-versed in the law or he sought to draw a fine distinction where none exists. Nevertheless, he employed it as an excuse to protect Clinton from prosecution in a case that should have rendered 110 criminal charges against her.
      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

      Comment


      • #4
        Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
        sigpic
        I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

        Comment


        • #5
          Wouldn't it be great if we had an attorney general with a spine? What a cream puff Jeff Sessions turned out to be.
          Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
          But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
          Than a fool in the eyes of God


          From "Fools Gold" by Petra

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
            Wouldn't it be great if we had an attorney general with a spine? What a cream puff Jeff Sessions turned out to be.
            Need an AG with a spine and a dozen guards plus a food taster when confronting the Clintons.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
              From the article....

              Either Comey is not well-versed in the law or he sought to draw a fine distinction where none exists. Nevertheless, he employed it as an excuse to protect Clinton from prosecution in a case that should have rendered 110 criminal charges against her.
              What he did, as we now know, was akin to a judge deciding a case without ever hearing the evidence.

              I'm always still in trouble again

              "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
              "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
              "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                What he did, as we now know, was akin to a judge deciding a case without ever hearing the evidence.
                And then scripting the narrative to support his decision.
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  yeah extreme carelessness is basically the legal definition of Gross Negligence.

                  From the Law Dictionary:


                  gross negligence

                  n. carelessness which is in reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, and is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people's rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence, but it is just shy of being intentionally evil. If one has borrowed or contracted to take care of another's property, then gross negligence is the failure to actively take the care one would of his/her own property. If gross negligence is found by the trier of fact (judge or jury), it can result in the award of punitive damages on top of general and special damages.

                  Comment

                  Related Threads

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by Mountain Man, Yesterday, 06:07 PM
                  11 responses
                  56 views
                  1 like
                  Last Post Sam
                  by Sam
                   
                  Started by seer, Yesterday, 09:26 AM
                  6 responses
                  35 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post rogue06
                  by rogue06
                   
                  Started by seer, Yesterday, 07:47 AM
                  8 responses
                  56 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post seer
                  by seer
                   
                  Started by Cow Poke, 05-06-2024, 02:53 PM
                  25 responses
                  146 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post Sparko
                  by Sparko
                   
                  Started by CivilDiscourse, 05-06-2024, 10:34 AM
                  31 responses
                  129 views
                  0 likes
                  Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                  Working...
                  X