Can Your Christianity Be Disproven?

[Rushing Jaws]

I don’t believe that the Bible is inerrant in any way. I do think that it can and should and must be judged like any other book, and I see absolutely no reason not to criticise it when need be. It is not perfect textually, and has not been perfectly preserved; I don’t see how belief in its total inerrancy makes sense, when it is imperfect in all other respects. The Church is grotesquely imperfect, always has been, and, for so long as it is on earth, it will be; yet it is the Body of Christ. Why then should the Bible any more preserved from sin and error ? The manner of God’s dealings with men seems to be, that He uses weak and imperfect instruments; the logic of total inerrantism seems to contradict that, and also to contradict the logic of the Cross, that the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God stronger than men. Total Inerrantism seems too close to Prosperity Theology, for both cater to the human longing for earthly security.