Originally posted by Terraceth
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Daniel Shavers killer walks free.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostAlso, unlike Europe, our insane national gun violence makes everyone skittish in these sorts of scenarios.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mountain ManThe question is whether or not he committed murder, which is killing with premeditation and malice -- or as the Bible describes it, a willful and cunning attack -- and based on the evidence, the answer appears to be no.
And you keep using the word "evidence," even though you refuse to look at it. I don't have a lot of patience for willful ignorance. There's another term for it: Intellectual dishonesty.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SparkoBut after all of the recent cop killings and terrorist attacks, I can't blame him for being nervous. He had no way to know if the kid had a gun or other weapon hidden down his pants.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Obsidian View PostThis idea that cops can kill people, because they have "no way to know" what might happen if they don't, is absolutely wicked. You are condoning what the Bible calls murder. You don't see a gun, you don't shoot. Period.
They warned this guy previously not to reach behind his back. It was a stupid mistake on the kid's part and on the cop's. But it was not murder. Cops have a right to protect themselves.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Obsidian View Post..."malice" just means intent to harm.
Legal definition: "evil intent on the part of a person who commits a wrongful act injurious to others"
Old Testament law uses the phrase "lying in wait" (suggesting premeditation) and killing someone with "cunning" (skill employed in a shrewd or sly manner, as in deceiving; craftiness; guile).
None of this applies in this case. Thus, the officer was acquitted of murder charges.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostThe police are far too quick to resort to the use of lethal force. We have seen this so many times.
Wow, an unattributed quote! Impressive.
Yababadoo - Fred Flintstone
The US has a violence problem, and a racism problem, and a policing problem, and the bodies will just keep piling up.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Adrift View PostYeah, that's actually a major point of the case. The guy giving commands, and the guy who shot were two different people. The guy giving the commands was heavily escalating the situation, making both the individual on the ground as well as his fellow officers incredibly nervous. In my opinion, he should have been investigated and probably charged as well. The commands were confusing, but sadly they weren't actually far off from what we were taught in Security Forces in the Air Force. It seems to me that the main reason they wanted the subjects to crawl to them was that they suspected that there were other armed gunmen in the room behind them, and they didn't want to take the risk of closing in and getting shot. Not to excuse the actions of these officers, but the main reason why so many cops are on edge is because so many cops are killed in the line of duty in the US compared to other nations. 135 in 2016 (which is way down from the numbers that were killed in the 70s and 80s, but still). Also, unlike Europe, our insane national gun violence makes everyone skittish in these sorts of scenarios.
https://www.redstate.com/patterico/2...t-perspective/
Its conclusions are ultimately ambivalent as to whether or not the officer who actually shot him was guilty of a crime, but is quite blunt in admitting that the sergeant yelling out the orders "has no business being a police officer." Did anything at all happen to him? It seems all the attention went to the shooter, but I'm not sure if anything at all happened to the shouter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostI agree. More guns leads to more gun violence. We must assume that you like it that way for some reason.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 07:29 PM
|
7 responses
41 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Starlight
Today, 03:16 AM
|
||
Started by seer, Yesterday, 06:18 PM
|
2 responses
16 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Yesterday, 06:55 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, 05-25-2024, 05:57 PM
|
12 responses
117 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 09:18 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-24-2024, 11:15 AM
|
11 responses
81 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 05:57 PM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, 05-24-2024, 06:59 AM
|
5 responses
51 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Sparko
05-24-2024, 08:16 AM
|
Comment