"manalive883" posted in AP201 that there is indeed scientific evidence for YEC. I was wondering if he would care to post on this thread. He also referred to science that disagreed with a 6/24 6000 year old creation as "provincial science". Never heard that pejorative before. I've heard "historical" vis-a-vis "operational" science used as argument-by-neologism, but never heard of science referred to as "provincial. " That sounds like something a witch doctor would practice.
He also said that the Genesis stories pointed unambiguously (his word) to a 6/24 young Earth. Well, that putative non-ambiguity is exactly what I'm looking for here.
He did mention Sarfati as a scientific authority on YEC. IIRC, he has made some whoppers, e.g., dearth of supernova remnants.
"manalive883", why don't you step up to the plate?
K54
He also said that the Genesis stories pointed unambiguously (his word) to a 6/24 young Earth. Well, that putative non-ambiguity is exactly what I'm looking for here.
He did mention Sarfati as a scientific authority on YEC. IIRC, he has made some whoppers, e.g., dearth of supernova remnants.
"manalive883", why don't you step up to the plate?
K54
Comment