-
March 7th 2003, 01:55 AM #1
State (or Public) Schools vs Private Schools
I made the mistake of talking about the politics of eduction with my mom. I just got a big lecture on how public schools aren't that bad. I think she's slightly stressed out and caffienated.
Anyway, If I have children, I don't think that they'll be attending state schools. Even if they do, it won't be until around high school.
Any thoughts from anyone?Dropping a few Eschatology Bombs, or "Let's think before we endorse another way."
-
March 7th 2003, 02:40 AM #2
The state schools are pretty bad. However, is it possible to stunt a child's cognitive development by isolating them during certain formative years?
"My love is nailed to the cross" - St. Ignatius the God-Bearer
“Prove your love and zeal for wisdom in actual deeds.” -- St. Callistus Xanthopoulos
I am Rob, True Poet of the True List. At least, that is what they tell me.
LaRubia is my private eye!

-
March 7th 2003, 02:55 AM #3
i think that he might be leaning toward private than homeschool.
We believe in one God, the Father, the Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is, seen and unseen. We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, light from light,true God from true God....
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father,
who with the Father and the Son is worshiped and glorified, who has spoken through the prophets.
We believe in one holy catholic and apostolic Church.
We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. We look for the resurrection of the dead,
and the life of the world to come. Amen.
My Creed is Nicene
-
March 7th 2003, 03:42 AM #4
Depends on the kids, and it depends on the schools. Kids who know how to think around the public school indoctrination are going to be okay, and they have an opportunity to influence their classmates--and possibly the school itself.
Frequently home-schooling is simply the better educational option.
Past high school, I agree with Francis Schaeffer: All mature Christian young adults should be going to "secular" (I can't tell you how I despise that word! Let's get rid of it!) colleges and universities--and turning them upside-down (or "righting" them, as the case may be). That is, unless they're going for seminary training.Capt. Ochre
"I am so confused."
--mossrose, summing up the mission of Theologyweb
"If he does remove a John Powell quote, I do have a suggestion."
--Trout
"In no possible worlds would a Trout quip ever appear in a Captain Ochre sig."
--LGM, referring to the impossibility of this signature line
"I never doubted for a moment that you had what it takes!"
--LGM, congratulating Trout on accomplishing the impossible
-
March 7th 2003, 07:55 AM #5
Patroclus:
- The state schools are pretty bad.
- However, is it possible to stunt a child's cognitive development by isolating them during certain formative years?
-
March 7th 2003, 08:30 AM #6Both of my daughters home-school their children (7 so far - the oldest starts college this year).The home-schooled kids I know are kids you can have a sensible conversation with.
They are so mature for their ages, so emotionally healthy, so delightful in interpersonal relationships - with people of all ages, infants, peers, the elderly.
-
March 7th 2003, 10:21 AM #7As a product of secular schools, who has seminary training I would heartily encourage going to secular schools for college. Although I wish I had not been forced to sit through so much boredom growing up.03-07-2003 @ 02:42 AM
Captain Ochre:
That is, unless they're going for seminary training.
GP"Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
-
March 7th 2003, 01:35 PM #8Indeed, I wasn't as clear on that point as I should have been. I simply meant that good seminary training is hard to come by in a secular school.03-07-2003 @ 02:21 PM
GrayPilgrim:
As a product of secular schools, who has seminary training I would heartily encourage going to secular schools for college. Although I wish I had not been forced to sit through so much boredom growing up.
GP
Capt. Ochre
"I am so confused."
--mossrose, summing up the mission of Theologyweb
"If he does remove a John Powell quote, I do have a suggestion."
--Trout
"In no possible worlds would a Trout quip ever appear in a Captain Ochre sig."
--LGM, referring to the impossibility of this signature line
"I never doubted for a moment that you had what it takes!"
--LGM, congratulating Trout on accomplishing the impossible
-
March 7th 2003, 02:36 PM #9
Ahh..I see yeah my undergrad was at Texas A&M and Ohio State. I majored in Hebrew so I had a Christian professor (who has a ThM from Dallas and his PhD from Harvard)and a number of Reformed Jews. But my MDiv is from Trinity Evangelical Divintiy School, so yeah, you can't go to a secular school and get good seminary education.
GP"Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
-
March 8th 2003, 02:07 AM #10I can only half-way agree with statement. Its a little to black and white --like saying Christian doctors should be medical missionaries or something like that. I've been in the state system since grade school and its my intention to get into a Christian university or college. No, I am not going to do seminary training although I might major in Theology. If I do wind up at UC, you can bet that there will be people you are bothered ("He's one of them!!") by my convictions though.Past high school, I agree with Francis Schaeffer: All mature Christian young adults should be going to "secular" (I can't tell you how I despise that word! Let's get rid of it!) colleges and universities--and turning them upside-down (or "righting" them, as the case may be). That is, unless they're going for seminary training.
Of course, I can see the reasons why Schaeffer would feel that way, we do need Christians on secular campus's, exactly where are we to "frustrate the wisdom of the wise" than a state college?Dropping a few Eschatology Bombs, or "Let's think before we endorse another way."
-
March 8th 2003, 05:40 PM #11He didn't have to "encourage" them, they interrmarried enough with the worldly populations enough that (for all intents and purposes) their gods were one and the same!Socrates: "I really couldn't see Moses enouraging the Israelite parents to send their kids to Canaanite schools."
Ah... So, now we know...GrayPilgrim: "I had a Christian professor (who has a ThM from Dallas and his PhD from Harvard)and a number of Reformed Jews. But my MDiv is from Trinity Evangelical Divintiy School..."
1) Your professor was probably a Dallas dispy.
2) Your Jewish professors undoubtably slipped in their Talmudic Judaism.
3) You attented a Divinity School that wouldn't deal with the nature of the Resurrection - an essential doctrine of Christianity.
As for this issue, as a homeschooling family I would readily praise that movement and add my dittos to John Reece's statement. Homeschooling is not hard and offers tremendous rewards - both academically and interpersonally.
Adieu,
--C
See, I can ad hom like the rest! :brow:(Deut 7:9-11 - The MOST IMPORTANT principle in the Bible.)
"I am not bound to please thee with my answer." --Wm. Shakespeare(cp. Gal 4:16)
-
March 8th 2003, 06:58 PM #121) Nope He weren't no dispy--03-08-2003 @ 04:40 PM
Cherith:
Ah... So, now we know...
1) Your professor was probably a Dallas dispy.
2) Your Jewish professors undoubtably slipped in their Talmudic Judaism.
3) You attented a Divinity School that wouldn't deal with the nature of the Resurrection - an essential doctrine of Christianity.
Adieu,
--C
:brow:
2) Talmudic Judaism may be silly and may be what my profs believed, but that has nothing to do with anything.
3) What the shamalamadingdong are you talking about?
So your ad hominem has little to do with anything."Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
-
March 9th 2003, 05:16 PM #13Call me crazy and unobservant, but generally I've found Reform Jews to be indistinguishable from liberal secularists. If they were Orthodox or Conservative, this accusation might have some merit, but this is just ludicrous suspicion of all-consuming viral yarmulkism. In making every instance of Jewishness a platform for your anti-Semitic crusade, you could at least accuse them EVIL NASTY JEWS of something closer to what they might actually believe (For instance, "Those Jews probably infected you with their accursed pinko-Commie-socialist economic tripe! Nothing you say has any merit!")Your Jewish professors undoubtably slipped in their Talmudic Judaism.
Get OFF the Jew-bashing bandwagon already.In reaction to Richwine Affair, all right-thinking people are quick to proclaim that they don’t believe in a genetic basis for IQ. They’re much less quick to explain – with any sort of precision – what they actually do believe in. At best, we’re treated to some hand-waving paired with the phrase “social construct.”.
-Foseti
-
March 10th 2003, 02:22 PM #14
Gray,
The arch-heretic Dr. Murray HARRIS denied inerrancy while at TEDS and wrote several books denying the nature of the resurrection. Dr. Norm Geisler and Dr. Robert Culver both went to the board and eventually wrote books detailing his heresies and what went on behind the scenes to no avail. Not only was HARRIS allowed to stay on, but I believe he was granted tenure as well.
I have GEISLER and CULVER's books on the subject if you are interested...?
BTW, I attended an Evangelical-Free church for 3 yrs or so and really enjoyed it while I was there, but the head guy was a Calvinist and when he moved out of state the Arminian viewpoint gained more and more ground... (For those who don't know, Charles SWINDOLL is their patron saint.
)
--C
BTW, I was just trying to show you guys how easy it is to jump to conclusions and label people without having to deal with the subject matter at hand. I see it worked.
:::going back to my little corner, now:::(Deut 7:9-11 - The MOST IMPORTANT principle in the Bible.)
"I am not bound to please thee with my answer." --Wm. Shakespeare(cp. Gal 4:16)
-
March 10th 2003, 05:37 PM #15
Harris was long gone by the time I got to TEDS. Never heard of Culver and not to fond of Geisler.
I attend an EFCA church right now where the apstor is a Calvinist and most people coming out of TEDS are as well, ask Jaltus he feels like a duck out of water being and Arminian, Osborne is the token Arminian. They hired Graham Cole to be a Wesleyan as well but from my one class with him last year its hardto call him Wesleyan.
GP"Reading the Bible in a translation is like kissing your bride through the veil."
Rabbinic Saying"To suppose that whatever God requireth of us that we have power of ourselves to do, is to make the cross and grace of Jesus Christ of none effect."
JOHN OWEN, III:433
Similar Threads
-
Public or Private Schools for Obama's Children?
By FormerFundy in forum Civics 101Replies: 24Last Post: November 12th 2008, 08:29 PM -
Public Schools - Get Out Now
By Dee Dee Warren in forum Home Economics 101Replies: 99Last Post: April 27th 2006, 04:46 PM -
Vouchers for private schools may be uncostitutional
By Bill Mutz in forum Civics 101Replies: 35Last Post: August 23rd 2004, 06:14 AM -
When private schools go bad!
By Eyeheart Pumpkin in forum Civics 101Replies: 2Last Post: August 9th 2004, 02:04 PM















































































Quote

Another example of the...
Today, 12:54 PM in Natural Science 301