Originally posted by rogue06
View Post
BTW, it was rejected in favor of "better together," which was, IMO, fairly lame. The article also goes on to note that Hillary could never truly articulate a clear "why I am running" message, which is also pretty widely known to be true (and a serious problem). The claim that she never accepted reponsibility for her loss is, however, untrue. Read her book. It explores BOTH the things she believes she did and did not do that led to the loss (pretty candidly, actually), as well as the circumstances she could NOT control that contributed. The latter gets the most press, but occupies significantly less space than the former in the actual book.
Folks MIGHT want to consider going to the source, instead of just reading what the right (or left) distills out for its own purposes. I also deplore this practice I encounter regularly on extremist sites (Mother Jones and Jezebel do it as often as Brietbart and NationaReview, as far as I can tell) of mixing truth with exaggeration or just outright misinformation to make the latter easier to swallow.
Comment