Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Trump Tweets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Starlight View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]25831[/ATTACH]

    Offsetting “like” in commas really hammered his point home.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Tassmoron View Post
      “That humans are causing global warming is the position of the Academies of Science from 80 countries plus many scientific organizations that study climate science. More specifically, around 95% of active climate researchers actively publishing climate papers endorse the consensus position.”

      https://www.skepticalscience.com/glo...termediate.htm

      That’s a lot of people you are accusing of conspiring to 'fool the world' about climate change. Surely it’s more prudent to accept the expertise of the vast majority of scientists...rather than denying it. If they are right, and it seems they are, the planet is in big trouble.
      Yeah, I've put the lie to the "consensus" claim often enough that you should know better by now.

      Source: Forbes

      ...the basic way it works is that a researcher reviews a lot of scholarly papers and classifies them by how many agree with a certain position.

      Unfortunately, in the case of 97% of climate scientists agreeing that human beings are the main cause of warming, the researchers have engaged in egregious misconduct.

      One of the main papers behind the 97 percent claim is authored by John Cook, who runs the popular website SkepticalScience.com, a virtual encyclopedia of arguments trying to defend predictions of catastrophic climate change from all challenges.

      Here is Cook’s summary of his paper: “Cook et al. (2013) found that over 97 percent [of papers he surveyed] endorsed the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause.”

      This is a fairly clear statement—97 percent of the papers surveyed endorsed the view that man-made greenhouse gases were the main cause—main in common usage meaning more than 50 percent.

      But even a quick scan of the paper reveals that this is not the case. Cook is able to demonstrate only that a relative handful endorse “the view that the Earth is warming up and human emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause.” Cook calls this “explicit endorsement with quantification” (quantification meaning 50 percent or more). The problem is, only a small percentage of the papers fall into this category; Cook does not say what percentage, but when the study was publicly challenged by economist David Friedman, one observer calculated that only 1.6 percent explicitly stated that man-made greenhouse gases caused at least 50 percent of global warming.

      Where did most of the 97 percent come from, then? Cook had created a category called “explicit endorsement without quantification”—that is, papers in which the author, by Cook’s admission, did not say whether 1 percent or 50 percent or 100 percent of the warming was caused by man. He had also created a category called “implicit endorsement,” for papers that imply (but don’t say) that there is some man-made global warming and don’t quantify it. In other words, he created two categories that he labeled as endorsing a view that they most certainly didn’t.

      The 97 percent claim is a deliberate misrepresentation designed to intimidate the public—and numerous scientists whose papers were classified by Cook protested:

      “Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.”
      —Dr. Richard Tol

      “That is not an accurate representation of my paper . . .”
      —Dr. Craig Idso

      “Nope . . . it is not an accurate representation.”
      —Dr. Nir Shaviv

      “Cook et al. (2013) is based on a strawman argument . . .”
      —Dr. Nicola Scafetta

      Think about how many times you hear that 97 percent or some similar figure thrown around. It’s based on crude manipulation propagated by people whose ideological agenda it serves. It is a license to intimidate.

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexeps.../#5831bfaa3f9f

      © Copyright Original Source


      There are no doubt a lot of people involved in this fraud. I can't tell you exactly why they're doing it, but the evidence is conclusive that they are.
      Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
      But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
      Than a fool in the eyes of God


      From "Fools Gold" by Petra

      Comment


      • #18
        I'm sure the global warming controversy will finally get settled on this thread.
        "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
          I'm sure the global warming controversy will finally get settled on this thread.
          And tWeb's Civics forum will eventually solve all the world's problems.
          Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
          But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
          Than a fool in the eyes of God


          From "Fools Gold" by Petra

          Comment


          • #20






            Sounds like he's releasing memo!
            Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return.

            Comment

            Related Threads

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
            26 responses
            177 views
            1 like
            Last Post rogue06
            by rogue06
             
            Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
            51 responses
            299 views
            0 likes
            Last Post seer
            by seer
             
            Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            1 like
            Last Post rogue06
            by rogue06
             
            Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-16-2024, 06:47 AM
            86 responses
            379 views
            0 likes
            Last Post rogue06
            by rogue06
             
            Started by carpedm9587, 04-14-2024, 02:07 PM
            60 responses
            378 views
            2 likes
            Last Post Mountain Man  
            Working...
            X