Freedom of religion - the separation of church and state - was the reason such institutions should not be taxed. see: http://www.latimes.com/la-oew-lynn-s...p23-story.html
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Why churches should not be taxed.
Collapse
X
-
Why churches should not be taxed.
. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJVTags: None
-
I agree with tax exemption with some limits. A group like the Church of Scientology that hides behind the veneer of religion to wreak havoc on people's lives, including those of non-adherents, should not have the right to tax exemption. At some point you have to draw some limits so that people are not claiming to be a religion to hide profits."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI agree with tax exemption with some limits. A group like the Church of Scientology that hides behind the veneer of religion to wreak havoc on people's lives, including those of non-adherents, should not have the right to tax exemption. At some point you have to draw some limits so that people are not claiming to be a religion to hide profits."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Darth Executor View PostThat line is drawn merely by being a non-profit. Employees of non-profits still have to pay personal taxes. So there's no reason to draw any special limits. If the Church of Scientology is wreaking havoc on people's lives via criminal means then prosecute the people responsible."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostBut the line between what is and isn't a non-profit isn't entirely clear
, as the exorbitant salaries of some religious leaders suggests. At some point there's a difference between a religion and a front organization.
You get more deductions and pay less tax just running a for-profit business than you do running a non-profit."As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." Isaiah 3:12
There is no such thing as innocence, only degrees of guilt.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostI agree with tax exemption with some limits. A group like the Church of Scientology that hides behind the veneer of religion to wreak havoc on people's lives, including those of non-adherents, should not have the right to tax exemption. At some point you have to draw some limits so that people are not claiming to be a religion to hide profits.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostALL religion "wreaks havoc on people's lives" and on society in general and should be taxed. The exception being the charitable components of many religious organisations.. . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV
. . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV
Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostALL religion "wreaks havoc on people's lives" and on society in general and should be taxed. The exception being the charitable components of many religious organisations."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by KingsGambit View PostIt's odd that you're making a sweeping statement and even capitalizing "all", yet then admitting an exception.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostThe exception is not related to religion but to the charitable work of many churches. Good works (from any source) should be supported by taxes, religious propaganda should not.
To give three points on the spectrum I have seen from particular Christian charities I have encountered: (1) they might view the food and drink they give to drug addicts as nothing but a way in for their 'true work' of bringing people to Jesus. (2) they might provide assistance to poor people with budgeting and helping them work through the backlog of bills, but if a person happens to come to Christ through their work with them, they count that as just as much of a win as if they'd helped them balance their budget. (3) World Vision USA refuses to hire gay employees because of their religious affiliation, but their charity work itself is, AFAIK, entirely secular.
I've come to the view that anything religious in origin is tainted, and I now make sure prior to donating to any charity that their origin isn't religious (that includes World Vision NZ, even though they've been okay with gay employees for years).
I don't think religious groups or religious charities should be tax-free. Especially not in my country where ~50% of people are non-religious. Why should particular groups who believe wacky things get taxpayer support?"I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostThere is a bit of a difficulty separating charitable work from religious work with many religious charities - a lot of them view themselves as doing both.
To give three points on the spectrum I have seen from particular Christian charities I have encountered: (1) they might view the food and drink they give to drug addicts as nothing but a way in for their 'true work' of bringing people to Jesus. (2) they might provide assistance to poor people with budgeting and helping them work through the backlog of bills, but if a person happens to come to Christ through their work with them, they count that as just as much of a win as if they'd helped them balance their budget. (3) World Vision USA refuses to hire gay employees because of their religious affiliation, but their charity work itself is, AFAIK, entirely secular.
I've come to the view that anything religious in origin is tainted, and I now make sure prior to donating to any charity that their origin isn't religious (that includes World Vision NZ, even though they've been okay with gay employees for years).
I don't think religious groups or religious charities should be tax-free. Especially not in my country where ~50% of people are non-religious. Why should particular groups who believe wacky things get taxpayer support?
My argument was one of principle rather than necessarily one of actuality. I.e. if some way could be reliably found to separate charitable work that originates in churches from religious propaganda, then I don’t think it should be taxed...as per any secular charity, e.g. Médecins Sans Frontières, Oxfam or Amnesty International.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, 03-27-2024, 04:19 PM
|
16 responses
162 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by One Bad Pig
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
53 responses
400 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 11:32 AM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
25 responses
114 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
Yesterday, 08:36 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
33 responses
198 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Roy
Yesterday, 07:43 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
84 responses
379 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by JimL
Yesterday, 11:08 AM
|
Comment