Originally posted by 37818
View Post
You rejected this phrase, and started coming up with convoluted explanations like Jesus having two natures prior to the incarnation. I don't think anyone on this site has really figured out what you meant by that since then.
Most explanations I've seen of "begotten" is taken to mean "one and only", or "unique". I'm thinking you do hold to that, even if you don't hold to the "Eternal Generation of the Son". Your the only one I've encountered that has argued against it, and from what I saw most of your argument was based on a misunderstanding of the phrase "begotten of the Father".
Comment