Originally posted by Adrift
View Post
Yes it would be, and no you haven't.
That might have sounded better in your head than it does in print. I have no idea what you're going on about.
That's essentially the same thing, especially when you add that "ending massacres would remove a topic of debate from your repertoire" because I "like to argue", which obviously implies that I want massacres to continue so that I have something to argue about. Don't blame me because you don't think through the stupid things you post.
I don't want to disarm an entire population so that they'll be at the mercy of an existential threat. Why in the world would I want that? I want to disarm the population so that we can finally put an end to gun violence in America.
Hmm. I don't remember doing that. Show me where you've seen me do that.
Your accusation is absurd. It doesn't make a lick of sense.
Comment