Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Graffiti Artist awarded $6.7M for destroyed work

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Sparko View Post
    That's why I said it would depend on the contract. If it were specified in the contract that the art could be removed once the lease was over, for instance, then it would be a simple matter to paint over them.
    You wouldn't even need that; the only way the owner's hands would be tied is if he agreed in the lease that the artwork would be preserved.
    But apparently in this case, the artwork and building became something of a famous landmark. And since the art was done legally, the artists did have a case to try to get the courts to declare it an actual landmark. The owner apparently decided to take matters into his own hand and painted over the artwork instead of waiting for the court to decide.
    It was a jackass move, but being a jackass isn't illegal.
    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
    sigpic
    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by One Bad Pig View Post
      You wouldn't even need that; the only way the owner's hands would be tied is if he agreed in the lease that the artwork would be preserved.

      It was a jackass move, but being a jackass isn't illegal.
      Apparently it is. That is what the OP story is about.

      Comment


      • #18
        If he took action with the knowledge that a legal remedy was being sought and with the explicit purpose of preventing that legal remedy then that probably did not sit well with the court. I suspect that's why the settlement award was so high.
        Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
        But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
        Than a fool in the eyes of God


        From "Fools Gold" by Petra

        Comment


        • #19
          Seems like they should have used that VARA law to stop those idiots from removing the confederate statues. Seems like the same principal to me. Those statues are works of art and landmarks.

          Comment


          • #20
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Artists_Rights_Act

            Comment


            • #21
              Yeah, but the statues were racist... or something.
              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
              Than a fool in the eyes of God


              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                Seems like they should have used that VARA law to stop those idiots from removing the confederate statues. Seems like the same principal to me. Those statues are works of art and landmarks.
                VARA, from what I can gather, largely expires upon the death of the author of the work. I don't think the creators of the Confederate statues are alive anymore, so I don't think it applies.

                Comment

                Related Threads

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
                12 responses
                64 views
                0 likes
                Last Post rogue06
                by rogue06
                 
                Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
                2 responses
                33 views
                0 likes
                Last Post rogue06
                by rogue06
                 
                Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 09:08 AM
                6 responses
                59 views
                0 likes
                Last Post RumTumTugger  
                Started by CivilDiscourse, Yesterday, 07:44 AM
                0 responses
                22 views
                0 likes
                Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                Started by seer, Yesterday, 07:04 AM
                49 responses
                229 views
                0 likes
                Last Post CivilDiscourse  
                Working...
                X