Originally posted by element771
View Post
And my argument doesn't fall apart, we then have to argue the science.
Why do you care if the science might not support that point in the future?
Its their argument that is undercut.
Its their argument that is undercut.
Also, the multiverse is built on three layers of speculation. I understand that it is in the conversation but it does not yet pose a serious alternative to the above. But we can have that conversation which will then determine how convincing the argument is.
However, this has in no way proven that the science is being missused in any way.
Comment