Originally posted by element771
View Post
You are conflating the two as usual. If you don't use the currently most accepted hypothesis in science, what should you use?
By this logic, you can never use any science to support anything. What if it changes?
I think...It is only a compelling possibility to you because you like that it undercuts the theological argument. If it supported it, you would be crying that it was pseudoscience.
Again you are assuming too much. My objections to multiverse are 100% scientific. I personally don't care if there was a multiverse. I have already explained the science behind the multiverse and why it is not actual science.
Also, on what planet are you living on where you think that it resits scientific development. Do you really think that scientists would curtail their research because of theological concerns?
Comment