Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
To say that a theist cannot use scientific facts to argue for the existence of God is an invalid position to have. There is no philosophical or logical justification for this point of view.
Explain how if the scientific theory itself says that there is no way to observe another universe, how could we observe another universe? Wouldn't this be beyond the abilities of science?
This is a very shallow argument ...the terminology is why it is not a legitimate question?!? Why are the constants just such that they allow carbon atoms to evolve into beings that can contemplate their own existence?
Is that better?
Comment