Announcement

Collapse

General Theistics 101 Guidelines

This area is open for nontheists and theists to interact on issues of theism and faith in a civilized manner. We ask that nontheist participation respect the theistic views of others and not seek to undermine theism in general, or advocate for nontheism. Such posts are more suited for and allowable in Apologetics 301 with very little restriction.

The moderators of this area are given great discretion to determine if a particular thread or comment would more appropriately belong in another forum area.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Opinions on Billy Graham

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    It makes a whole world of difference. Again, you're entitled to be wrong -- even woefully.
    You too!
    The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

    I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post
      I agree. I do however think that bringing the disconnects like this to the fore can help the discussion to be more fruitful. If neither side can see a certain disconnect, then you just end up talking past each other.

      About the underlined bit, he does seem a bit like a non-theistic version of robrecht if you ask me.
      I'm guessing you don't mean THIS robrecht? Who is robrecht?


      (I do agree with your observation about disconnects, however. I had not considered this issue from the perspective of "everyone's a sinner." When someone has that dismal a view of human nature, things like the Graham Rule would obviously make perfect sense. They don't when your view of human nature is less dark. Until you brought that up, I had not even considered it).
      The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

      I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Adrift View Post
        For as irritating as he could be, I found robrecht far more...I don't know...rational? And maybe emotionless? I hate to say it, but carpe is not the person I remember him being 10 years ago. At all. But I'm certain the same could be said of me.


        (though I have to admit to being a bit perplexed about the "emotion" part. I think I have felt frustrated a couple times, irritated once, laughed my butt off with CP more than few times, but mostly this is an exercise in discussion and debate. I don't typically feel all that emotional about it. If you were reading "emotion" into the posts I made here...then it didn't come from me.)
        The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

        I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by carpedm9587 View Post


          (though I have to admit to being a bit perplexed about the "emotion" part. I think I have felt frustrated a couple times, irritated once, laughed my butt off with CP more than few times, but mostly this is an exercise in discussion and debate. I don't typically feel all that emotional about it. If you were reading "emotion" into the posts I made here...then it didn't come from me.)
          I don't believe you.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Zymologist View Post
            I'm to the point where, if I wasn't a Christian, I'd probably be a straight-up nihilist and a misanthrope. (I might be those things anyway)

            People suck. The varieties of our screwed-up-ness are never-ending.
            Then I'm glad for you that you're a Christian. I would hate for anyone to go through life with such a negative view of everything. Most of the people I meet and engage with every day are awesome. Sometimes quirky (like CP), sometimes acerbic (like Adrift), sometimes borderline certifiable (like MM), but each one has something unique to offer, and each one brings something to the table. The truly evil people of the world are comparatively rare. But we do have a tendency, these days, to paint those who do not agree with us in the colors of "the enemy" or "evil" or "bad." That much is a bit disappointing.
            The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

            I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Adrift View Post
              I don't believe you.
              You've made that much clear several times. You and Jedidiah have some significant trust issues


              (actually - I did feel concern at one point - when it seemed to me that CP thought I was disparaging his marriage or his wife.)
              Last edited by carpedm9587; 02-21-2018, 05:28 PM.
              The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

              I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by carpedm9587 View Post
                There is a huge difference between a person that conveys a message, by book and word, that people want to hear and want to pay for, and a man who tells people that they have to donate because god wants them to have a jet or is threatening to "take them to heaven."

                If I reject B.G. for being successful preaching a message I don't happen to agree with, then I have to reject every self-help expert, every motivational speaker, and every post-career politician that ever existed. When someone sets out to dube the gullible, they deserve our disdain. When they are just preaching something they believe in that you do not happen to agree with, IMO, they do not.

                I have to admit I am MORE impressed by men who preach this message and maintain a humble lifestyle (e.g., Ghandi, M.L.K., Mandela, etc.). But I do not begrudge someone their success.
                I will not post what I was going to you said what I was trying to with more grace then I was going to. thank you.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by JimL View Post
                  Yes, I can read. He say's I think it can be phrased respectfully. I think it can be phrased respectively as well, but that's not a request that we necessarily do so. And since when is not following such a request against the rules?
                  this is the wrong area for you to be disrespectful JimL this spin off was put in General Theistics instead of Apologetics for a reason the op wanted a respectful discussion. if you can't voice your opinions in a respectful manner then dont' post at all here in this thread or any thread in General Theistics.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by RumTumTugger View Post
                    I will not post what I was going to you said what I was trying to with more grace then I was going to. thank you.
                    Bartender? Times two, please.

                    ETA: Fourth time through, it finally parsed.
                    I will not post what I was going to.

                    You said what I was trying to say with more grace than I was going to.

                    Thank you.

                    The original was far more amusing.
                    Last edited by Juvenal; 02-21-2018, 06:24 PM.

                    Comment


                    • I liked BG. I don't know anything about what he said on the Nixon tapes, and I'm not going to rake up that muck, either. Out of respect for BG, I'll withhold my less laudatory opinions of his offspring. The crusades were weird, and they attracted even weirder camp followers, but all in all, I'd say his legacy includes more good than harm, by my measure of whether he inspired courtesy and kindness.

                      As to the Graham rule, sounds good to me for anyone who speaks to that many people at once. Large audiences attract groupies, and there's a need for active defenses when they show up.

                      Comment


                      • As a woman, if a man who is not my husband suggested that he and I spend time together alone, I would vehemently oppose the suggestion out of suspicion.

                        If I knew a man who was known to have spent time alone with women other than his wife, I would suspect him of having an affair. Even if I personally saw him interacting respectfully with others, that would not, in itself, be enough to dispel the suspicion. "If men speak ill of you, live so that no one will believe them". - Plato
                        Curiosity never hurt anyone. It was stupidity that killed the cat.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by QuantaFille View Post
                          As a woman, if a man who is not my husband suggested that he and I spend time together alone, I would vehemently oppose the suggestion out of suspicion.

                          If I knew a man who was known to have spent time alone with women other than his wife, I would suspect him of having an affair. Even if I personally saw him interacting respectfully with others, that would not, in itself, be enough to dispel the suspicion. "If men speak ill of you, live so that no one will believe them". - Plato
                          I don't think anyone here (certainly not I) was talking about the first. I would be suspicious of such an exchange as well. Assuming it was "let's spend time alone." If it was a colleague and she stopped by my office at noon and said, "want to do lunch?" I would think no more about it than I would if a male colleague did the same. If a female colleague said to me, "can I talk to you about something, privately?" again, I would grant the same request unless I had cause to think their might be a problem (e.g., previous flirtation, uncomfortable gifts, etc.) My wife tells me she feels the same way. But if someone said, "let's spend some time alone together," I'd be suspicious.

                          Your second is troubling. It is, IMO, far too broad. Again, if we were talking about a priest hearing confessions, I wouldn't think twice about it. If we were talking about a counselor or psychiatrist seeing a woman patient, I wouldn't think twice about it. If it was a minister who counseled anyone who wanted it, I wouldn't think twice about it. If it was a male or female doctor seeing a patient of the opposite sex, I wouldn't think twice about it. I am a man, I have spent time alone with women who were not my wife. Sometimes it was in the school kitchen preparing a meal for the scout troop that was to arrive later in the evening. Sometimes it was at work, going over courses and plans for projects. Sometimes it was simply getting together with an old friend. I would never think to demean any of these people by insisting we have a chaperone so no one would think I was "having an affair," or so I wouldn't be "tempted and lose control."

                          I think it comes down to fear. Long ago, I decided I would not live my life in fear of what MIGHT happen. I live my life according to my conscience, and the rest can take care of themselves. But it also comes down to trust. The message "I cannot be alone with a woman/man" communicates "I don't trust myself to be moral" and "I don't trust the rest of you to trust me!" It sows the seeds for a suspicious community. It is not something I would ever do, without just cause - and "because you're a woman" is not "just cause."

                          But I DO understand (though I disagree with) the perspective brought up earlier - that human nature is "implicitly sinful" - and the impact that has on trust and the need to protect oneself. After all, if everyone is debased, then this rule makes perfect sense - and there is no one being disrespected because no one really deserves respect. This point of view is one of the many, many, reasons I am no longer Christian.
                          The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

                          I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by lao tzu View Post
                            I liked BG. I don't know anything about what he said on the Nixon tapes, and I'm not going to rake up that muck, either. Out of respect for BG, I'll withhold my less laudatory opinions of his offspring. The crusades were weird, and they attracted even weirder camp followers, but all in all, I'd say his legacy includes more good than harm, by my measure of whether he inspired courtesy and kindness.

                            As to the Graham rule, sounds good to me for anyone who speaks to that many people at once. Large audiences attract groupies, and there's a need for active defenses when they show up.
                            Yes - I agree with the groupie phenomenon. To me, that would be "just cause." I don't think I'll ever have to worry about it, because I don't think I'll ever have BG's crowds. But I DID catch CP winking at me in another post...so we'll be using a chaperone from now on!
                            The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

                            I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by carpedm9587 View Post
                              But I DID catch CP winking at me in another post...
                              Says here that leads to dancing.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by lao tzu View Post
                                Says here that leads to dancing.
                                The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King

                                I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas

                                Comment

                                widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                                Working...
                                X