Trump 2020

[demi-conservative]

Poll numbers of Trump rising, libs getting worried, now Trump announced campaign!

Donald Trump has confirmed he's running for re-election in 2020 and this is why he'll probably win

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/...-a8231546.html

4 more years coming right up, libs!

[Mountain Man]

John Nolte explains why this was a politically brilliant maneuver:

Source: Trump’s Super-Early 2020 Announcement Kills Another Dumb Norm — It’s Also Smart

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...rm-also-smart/

© Copyright Original Source

[EvoUK]

[Cow Poke]

Have you noticed how marginalized Schumer and Pelosi have become with Trump having these sit-down listening sessions?

[Mountain Man]

No, I've always been blunt. My best friend once described my discourse style as "You say no more than what needs to be said."

[Charles]

No, I've always been blunt. My best friend once described my discourse style as "You say no more than what needs to be said."

I think you have managed to do far more than that

[Mountain Man]

I think you have managed to do far more than that

You only think that, because every time my comments are directed at you, your ignorance is exposed for all to see.

[Charles]

You only think that, because every time my comments are directed at you, your ignorance is exposed for all to see.

But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of Mountain Man
Than a fool in the eyes of God (if he exists)

[Mountain Man]

But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of Mountain Man
Than a fool in the eyes of God (if he exists)

"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.'" -Psalm 14:1

[Charles]

"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.'" -Psalm 14:1

1) I have not said there is no God. 2) Your post does not give us any reason to believe there is. It is more than a little naive that you can avoid discussion by calling those who disagree for fools.

[Tassman]

1) I have not said there is no God. 2) Your post does not give us any reason to believe there is. It is more than a little naive that you can avoid discussion by calling those who disagree for fools.

It's all they've got. They cannot provide any substantive evidence for deities, so they sneer.

[Mountain Man]

Atheists of your low-calibre deserve no more than a mocking laugh and a dismissive wave. If you wish to prove otherwise then I challenge you to start a thread in Apologetics where you accurately describe the best arguments for theism and then competently explain why those arguments fail.

[Charles]

Atheists of your low-calibre deserve no more than a mocking laugh and a dismissive wave. If you wish to prove otherwise then I challenge you to start a thread in Apologetics where you accurately describe the best arguments for theism and then competently explain why those arguments fail.

I notice a big self confidence in your post and yet nothing in it supports the idea that God exists. It starts of with a personal attack and them goes on to assume, without any proof whatsoever, that Tassman would not be able to show why the best arguments for theism fail. As soon as he gave just one argument strengthening his case, he would be ahead of you since you gave none.

[Mountain Man]

I notice a big self confidence in your post and yet nothing in it supports the idea that God exists. It starts of with a personal attack and them goes on to assume, without any proof whatsoever, that Tassman would not be able to show why the best arguments for theism fail. As soon as he gave just one argument strengthening his case, he would be ahead of you since you gave none.

Send me a link as soon as you or Tass have the guts to start a thread like I've challenged. I look forward to reading it if only because it'll be good for a laugh.

[Charles]

Send me a link as soon as you or Tass have the guts to start a thread like I've challenged. I look forward to reading it if only because it'll be good for a laugh.

I don't think you got the point. It is rather simple. Try to read it again. And you who feel so confident that you are right just managed to make another post with nothing strenthening the case you feel so certain about.

I can easily challenge you that you would not be able to show why the best arguments for agnosticism fail. I can easily say beforehand that I have won and that what you write is going to be laughable. I can say all that sort of stuff beforehand. It proves nothing and you should know. Whatever you can say about us not starting a thread we can say about you not starting one about atheism or agnosticism. It is completely childish.

So this leaves us at the point where you still haven't given us anything to strengthen the idea that it is foolish to say that God does not exist.