Originally posted by carpedm9587
View Post
Actually, not "without any evidence." My evidence is the extensive passage of time before writing, the extensive distribution of the communities, the evidence in the historical sequence of an evolving theology, modern science about the function of human memory, best practices from the historical community, widespread debunking of so-called "miracles," and the list goes on.
So you can call it "evidence you do not accept," but the claim that it is "no evidence" is simply false. It is evidence I find compelling, and you do not. That much appears to be true.
So you can call it "evidence you do not accept," but the claim that it is "no evidence" is simply false. It is evidence I find compelling, and you do not. That much appears to be true.
Comment