Mueller's questions for Trump

[firstfloor]

http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/t...icle-1.3965486

[JimL]

Hyuck, Hyuck! wow you're a real comedian! How do you think of such clever comebacks?

If these were Meuller's questions, then why won't they give a source of where they got them? Just another anonymous claim by the Failing New York Times.

If journalists give up their sources, then they will no longer have any sources. Trumps lawyers requested and apparently got this list of questions back in March, and the White House leaks like a sieve, probably because there are some patriotic americans still employed there doing the leaking. Sometimes the leaks, if he thinks it in his interests, probably come from Trump himself, and since his response to this leak was; "look, there is no collusion implied in those questions," then there is a possibility that he okayed the leak himself.

[JimL]

Of course what I'd really like to see is a list of questions that Mueller wants to ask Comey. Or McCabe. Or Steele. Or even Hillary and Obama.

Of course that's what you'd really like to see, that's what all you conned Trumpsters would like to see.

[Cow Poke]

If journalists give up their sources, then they will no longer have any sources. ....

Which makes it really easy to totally make stuff up and claim "an unnamed source said...."

[JimL]

Which makes it really easy to totally make stuff up and claim "an unnamed source said...."

Yes, we all underdstand how you feel about journalist's and journalism. But at least you have Fox News, Breitbart, RT News, and one of Trumps favorites, the National Inquirerer to depend upon.

[Mountain Man]

So, CNN, based on the fact that these questions don't sound like something a lawyer would write (and I agree), and the grammar is odd.... thinks these questions were leaked by Trump.

Mueller's former assistant says grammatical errors prove leaked questions came from Trump

But Dimbulb assured us that these questions contain "eye-widening" revelations!

[Cow Poke]

Yes, we all underdstand how you feel about journalist's and journalism.

You got a frog in your pocket? But, no, you have no clue.

But at least you have Fox News, Breitbart, RT News, and one of Trumps favorites, the National Inquirerer to depend upon.

None of which I follow.

[JimL]

Which makes it really easy to totally make stuff up and claim "an unnamed source said...."

Apparently what's easy is the convincing of conservatives that whatever real news they don't like is just journalist making stuff up. So you believe the propagandists, the talking heads, but not the journalists. Funny that!

[JimL]

You got a frog in your pocket? But, no, you have no clue.



None of which I follow.

Just curious then, where do you get your news?

[Cow Poke]

Apparently what's easy is the convincing of conservatives that whatever real news they don't like is just journalist making stuff up.

Actually, there are quite a number of cases of 'journalists' totally making stuff up - having nothing to do with 'conservatives vs liberals'.

So you believe the propagandists, the talking heads, but not the journalists. Funny that!

If it were true, it would be sad, not funny. But you have a very twisted sense of reality, so....

[Sparko]

So, CNN, based on the fact that these questions don't sound like something a lawyer would write (and I agree), and the grammar is odd.... thinks these questions were leaked by Trump.

Mueller's former assistant says grammatical errors prove leaked questions came from Trump

Not sure I buy that explanation. More likely these were just made up by someone on the left who wants these questions to be asked by Mueller and then leaked them to the NYT. Someone who has no experience with legal interrogatories or grammar.

The thing is, these questions are so obviously fake and not from Mueller or actual lawyers that the NYT and the other media should have recognized it right off the bat and never published it. But they don't care. They will publish anything that takes a stab at Trump, without checking their sources. Which is why they have lost all credibility with the public.

[JimL]

Not sure I buy that explanation. More likely these were just made up by someone on the left who wants these questions to be asked by Mueller and then leaked them to the NYT. Someone who has no experience with legal interrogatories or grammar.

The thing is, these questions are so obviously fake and not from Mueller or actual lawyers that the NYT and the other media should have recognized it right off the bat and never published it. But they don't care. They will publish anything that takes a stab at Trump, without checking their sources. Which is why they have lost all credibility with the public.

Most likely they were rewritten by one of Trumps idiot legal advisors so that idiot Trump could better understand them.

[One Bad Pig]

Most likely they were rewritten by one of Trumps idiot legal advisors so that idiot Trump could better understand them.

CEPG0BtWoAAlovd.jpg

[Sparko]

Most likely they were rewritten by one of Trumps idiot legal advisors so that idiot Trump could better understand them.

I thought you were going with the tale that these were actually Mueller's questions? Change your mind now?

[firstfloor]

Which makes it really easy to totally make stuff up and claim "an unnamed source said...."

Make credibility a factor and so we know you have not been seduced by the dark side, do please give us a few words on why newspapers protect their sources. Who are the sources protected from?