Originally posted by Leonhard
View Post
Except in those cases it would be a matter of discriminating against persons, and not a matter of free speech. Something everyone here except you agrees with, and I have a feeling you're just trying to act like a contrarian.
Regarding the masterpiece-cake-shop reference this is the link you should have been after, not the rambling off-topic op-ed piece you offered.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/04/u...ay-couple.html
This ruling was focused on the individual facts of this particular case, so it doesn’t set much of a precedent for future similar cases. Justice Kennedy strongly reaffirmed protections for gay rights. So despite losing in this particular instance, LGBT advocates have avoided a ruling that could set a bad national standard for LGBT rights nationwide.
In short, it was a one-off ruling.
The rest of your post is off topic.
Comment