Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
You are merely repeating your same bald assertion.
Once again, of the "THOUSANDS of manuscript copies" there is no way of being certain of what was the original reading because the best Greek manuscripts, both earlier and later ones, have variant readings” the reliability of which were estimated by the more than 100 members of the UBS translation committee by voting on their perceived reliability ranging from A to D. This from K. L. Barker PhD, (ed.) ‘The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation’.
Ralph Earle is quoting K. L. Barker (ed.), "The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation", Paperback – 1986, PP 58-59. Your point?
Let me remind you that "The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts".
https://www.biblegateway.com/version...ion-NIV-Bible/
Once again, of the "THOUSANDS of manuscript copies" there is no way of being certain of what was the original reading because the best Greek manuscripts, both earlier and later ones, have variant readings” the reliability of which were estimated by the more than 100 members of the UBS translation committee by voting on their perceived reliability ranging from A to D. This from K. L. Barker PhD, (ed.) ‘The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation’.
Ralph Earle is quoting K. L. Barker (ed.), "The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation", Paperback – 1986, PP 58-59. Your point?
Let me remind you that "The New International Version (NIV) is a completely original translation of the Bible developed by more than one hundred scholars working from the best available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts".
https://www.biblegateway.com/version...ion-NIV-Bible/
Comment