Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Harvard Study: Christianity Is Not Shrinking, But Growing Stronger In The US.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
    The number of people who literally take all of the Bible... um... literally... is vanishingly small.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Teallaura View Post
      John, Peter, Mary, et al - your incredulity is not impeachment.
      Oh, you mean the fictionally based characters in the gospel stories?
      Then why are you bothering to argue? Just admit you do not understand how to read history, myth or literature sufficiently well enough to distinguish them without the help of a librarian.
      Don't be silly Tea, implied history could just as well be fiction, which of the two is actually true has nothing to do with the reader.
      It is simple incredulity - you have no genuine basis for discrediting any of the witnesses - 'I don't believe it' is not a genuine basis. Or legitimate. Or rational.
      If someone comes up to you today and says he just walked across the lake, then it is very rational to discredit them. I'm sure you'd do the same, but for some reason because it's in an acient book you believe it.
      An assertion with zero evidence is just an assertion - you can't impeach the witnesses appropriately; you can't distinguish myth from history; and that gives me perfect grounds for discrediting you as an expert witness - which makes this all baseless assertion.

      I'll remind you now that you began this argument with your assertions - the burden is still on you.
      There is no burden on me, I'm just pointing out the irrational nature of your belief, but you are free to believe whatever you want.
      Nonsense - the Gospels not only hold up, but time and again they have been proven correct when historians thought they were in error.

      Incredulity and a poor interpretation of literary forms do not help you case.
      Malarky. Walking on water, resurrecting of saints, ascending gods, demons and their exorcisms, feeding 5000 with 2 fish, etc etc., none of that nonsense holds up and has never been proven correct.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Teallaura View Post

        It is simple incredulity - you have no genuine basis for discrediting any of the witnesses - 'I don't believe it' is not a genuine basis. Or legitimate. Or rational.

        Comment

        Related Threads

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 01:19 PM
        9 responses
        67 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seanD
        by seanD
         
        Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 12:23 PM
        32 responses
        124 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Cow Poke  
        Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 11:46 AM
        16 responses
        120 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Stoic
        by Stoic
         
        Started by seer, Yesterday, 04:37 AM
        23 responses
        109 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seanD
        by seanD
         
        Started by seanD, 05-02-2024, 04:10 AM
        27 responses
        157 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seanD
        by seanD
         
        Working...
        X