12 Russians Accused Of Hacking Democrats...

[Mountain Man]

And that's exactly what he is going to prove, not that absolute proof will mean anything to you MM. You, along with the rest of the cult members will still be in denial, still be in defensive mode, making excuses. The law and order party, the wrap themselves in the flag party, the real patriots! Ha, what a joke.

Delusions die hard, it seems.

[Cow Poke]

You guys are blind. The man asked the single most significant enemy of the United states to help find dirt on an opponent in a presidential election! That is treason!

Is there no limit to the depths of depravity you will tolerate to nurse your hatred of Hillary or democratic policies? I sometimes think you would elect Satan himself just to be sure a democrat didn't win.

Jim

Jim, when the Christian haters start patting you on the back, it's time to look at what you're actually saying. I, for one, take exception to this emotional outburst. I don't hate Hillary, but I believe she would have been a disaster to SCOTUS. And the only "democratic policy" I actually hate is the advocacy of the murder of the unborn. Further, when I 'voted for' Trump, I truly did not believe he had a snowball's chance in the hot place.

BUT, your post did get a nice round of amens from the Christian haters, so there's that.

[Cow Poke]

That's only because they never found them, after all the hacking of computers the Russians never hacked into Hillary's.

NYTimes says that experts who actually know anything about this tend to disagree.

[Mountain Man]

NYTimes says that experts who actually know anything about this tend to disagree.

I don't think there is anybody who seriously believes that Hillary's unsecured private server wasn't hacked. It would have been trivial given the almost complete lack of safeguards. Even our allies were likely keeping tabs on it to make sure Hillary wasn't planning to stab them in the back.

[JimL]

NYTimes says that experts who actually know anything about this tend to disagree.

Yeah right CP, and they didn't make public the hacked e-mails that you believe would have insured Trumps winning the election, why?

[JimL]

Jim, when the Christian haters start patting you on the back, it's time to look at what you're actually saying. I, for one, take exception to this emotional outburst. I don't hate Hillary, but I believe she would have been a disaster to SCOTUS. And the only "democratic policy" I actually hate is the advocacy of the murder of the unborn. Further, when I 'voted for' Trump, I truly did not believe he had a snowball's chance in the hot place.

BUT, your post did get a nice round of amens from the Christian haters, so there's that.

We're not christian haters CP, like Jim, we just hate christian hypocricy.

[Cow Poke]

Yeah right CP, and they didn't make public the hacked e-mails that you believe would have insured Trumps winning the election, why?

There ya go trying to do that mindreading thing again.

A) The "hacked e-mails that you believe would have insured Trumps [sic] winning the election" is just downright GOOFUS!
2) He won WITHOUT the dummy claim above

Let's see... NYTimes < > JimL

I think I'll go with the Times on this one.

[Cow Poke]

We're not christian haters CP,

walks like it, talks like it....

like Jim, we just hate christian hypocricy.

You mean hypocrisy, I'm sure.

[JimL]

There ya go trying to do that mindreading thing again.

A) The "hacked e-mails that you believe would have insured Trumps [sic] winning the election" is just downright GOOFUS!
2) He won WITHOUT the dummy claim above

But his win was far from insured, as a matter of fact most people, including yourself didn't think Trump had a snowballs chance in a hot place of winning. So, tell me, if they hacked Hillary, why didn't they release the e-mails that would have insured the election of your treasonous candidate?

Let's see... NYTimes < > JimL

I think I'll go with the Times on this one.

It's only fake news when you don't like whats reported, is that it?

[Cow Poke]

But his win was far from insured, as a matter of fact most people, including yourself didn't think Trump had a snowballs chance in a hot place of winning.

OK, junior mindreader, what, specifically, did the Russians to do influence me to vote for Trump instead of Hillary?

It's only fake news when you don't like whats reported, is that it?

You would need to take that up with somebody who claims that NYTimes is fake news. It looks, however, like you believe it's fake news when it goes against something you wrongly believe.

[rogue06]

OK, junior mindreader, what, specifically, did the Russians to do influence me to vote for Trump instead of Hillary?

They spent a minuscule amount of money, much of it AFTER the election. Umm, oh, wait.

[One Bad Pig]

They spent a minuscule amount of money, much of it AFTER the election. Umm, oh, wait.

Let me help. Maybe it was all the Facebook ads I never saw on the Facebook account I don't have, or all the clickbait I refused to take because I have a thing against malware, or the Fox News I don't watch, or my favorite commentator, who made it a point to vote for John Kasich in the general election....

[lilpixieofterror]

Oh yeah that's right, I'm so sorry, I forgot how fair you were concerning Hillary, the Clinton Foundation, and Benghazi.

[oxmixmudd]

Hillary is the devil. We chose to elect someone who was not.

As I said previously, the election we each had to decide who was the closest to the devil and vote accordingly.

All of my responses and opinions are based primarily on what DT has become and shown himself to be post the election, which only confirms my assessment he was the one closest to the Devil.

Nevertheless, the problem here is that so many keep looking the other way with him. IF the folks that voted for Trump were calling him out on his largess, I would have no problem. But so many I talk to that say they voted for trump as a protest against 'The Hillory" keep trying to support the unsupportable. They ignore his deference to Putin. They ignore his deference to big business at the expense of the innocent. They ignore his excessively harsh immigration policies (LATEST: now they are going to directly bill the parents of the children they stole $800 for the DNA test to prove they really are the parents!) They ignore his hostility to science - especially where that hostility is driven by big business concerns (primarily in the area of Global warning and Environmental protection). Which begs a different sort of question. Do you really want to go back to the sort of environmental policies that allowed the disaster that was the Monongahela? Strip mining? Abuse of coal miners and their families? Do you really suppose big business will actually care about what they do to the environment if they are not forced to care? Certainly not if people with no conscience like DT are at the helm!

Jim

[KingsGambit]

What about the Russian troll farms on Reddit, which were unmasked by the site CEO and explained to users in a site Q&A? Many of the accounts would link conspiracy theories as "trial balloons" to see if they would take off. The Pizzagate conspiracy theory was one such one.

With all due respect, CP, I don't think it's right to ding anyone for being amened by non-Christians. I've frequently found myself being amened predominantly by non-Christians in Civics threads, and I've just as often found myself amened only by the Christians. I noticed the same phenomenon with Adrift's posting.