Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

orthodox Christians only.

Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?

This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.

The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Implications of Calvinism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Scrawly View Post
    Originally Posted by NorrinRadd View Post
    So choice is constrained by nature.
    Yes. People choose in accordance with their natures.
    So their natures limit their abilities.

    How does "nature" differ from "ability"?
    Nature desires. Are we able to choose contrary to our nature? It appears we don't want to.
    Ok, so we don't choose contrary to our nature because we don't desire to do so.

    You seem to be talking in circles, not advancing the discussion.


    t sounds to me as though God punishes people for making choices they are unable to NOT make.
    God punishes people for sinning. He doesn't cause them to sin.
    I have not so far suggested that God causes them to sin. Logical regression may lead to that at some point.

    At this point, all I'm saying is that it appears God punishes people for doing the only things they are able to do.

    In what way does that even remotely resemble "justice"?
    In what way doesn't it?
    It is self-evident that one should not be punished for something he is unable to avoid doing.

    So "freewill" is indeed disengenuous. For those listeners in Rio Linda, that means "lie."
    Sinners act in accordance with their will. They freely choose to sin because that is what they desire. They are indeed dead in their trespasses. Let's call it "willing bondage of the freewill" if that helps things.
    It helps as much as calling a circle a 4-sided triangle. It's Orwellian gobbledygook.


    And as above, their (fake) freewill is in bondage to their desires, which in turn are in bondage to their "natures."
    Their willing bondage of the will is what it is. We all have sin natures which we willingly indulge.
    In your view, we willingly indulge them because we are unable to will otherwise. We are in "bondage," and are punished for being bound.


    So they are slaves being punished for doing what their masters force them to do.
    God is not forcing them to sin. They do that of their own accord, being by nature children of wrath.
    I did not say "God."

    If they do it "of their own accord," what is the source of that "accord"? Whence came this "accord" that only inclines in one direction?
    Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

    Beige Federalist.

    Nationalist Christian.

    "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

    Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

    Proud member of the this space left blank community.

    Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.

    Justice for Ashli Babbitt!

    Justice for Matthew Perna!

    Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Scrawly View Post
      Yes. People choose in accordance with their natures.

      Nature desires. Are we able to choose contrary to our nature? It appears we don't want to.

      God punishes people for sinning. He doesn't cause them to sin.
      Who created us with this nature to sin?
      Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Scrawly View Post
        I'm satisfied with what I did provide. I've said my piece, and I'm happy to leave it at that for now.
        I'm not satisfied with your response either. You ignored his questions.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
          I'm not satisfied with your response either. You ignored his questions.
          I hesitate to speculate beyond what I have already written, so I elect to leave it at that. I would however like to reiterate that we are all dead in our trespasses and sins, naturally inclined toward self-righteousness and sin. I affirmed that we are all deserving of hell, being by nature children of wrath. I affirmed that God graciously elected some to salvation and sanctification through the Lord Jesus Christ by faith in the gospel of grace and indwelling of the Holy Spirit -- and with that I am satisfied. Your mileage may vary.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Scrawly View Post
            I hesitate to speculate beyond what I have already written,
            I think that would have been the better and humbler response. The rest, that you've repeated multiple times now just comes across as someone reading from a tract. We know this is what Calvinists hold as a creed, the question is whether it makes sense.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Jedidiah
              My point is that judging God is visible active sin.
              Rationally examining Calvinism, its assumptions, whether they are in tension, what they imply, whether that makes sense, etc... is not to judge God. We know some things of God by the nature of His being. Such as Him being the source of all goodness. And this has implications. I don't know of any theological worldview without tensions or paradoxes, it seems to many of us that Calvinists want to say at the same time that animals don't sin, because they lack free will, that humans have free will, and yet also at the same time that our 'free wills' are completely ordained by God.

              This among other things has the implication, which is inescapable, that God creates some people so that they can go to Hell for His own glory.

              That's not something I think that makes sense, given the nature of Goodness itself, or Scripture which clearly teaches that God desires that no one goes to Hell, but that they repent and turn around.

              Having a discussion about any of that, does not qualify as actively sinning Jedidiah. To say that sounds more like a preacher who wants to shut down discussion.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by lee_merrill View Post
                Chapter and verse, please?

                But let's remember that the ox that gored was to be put to death, and its flesh not eaten (Ex. 21:28). Responsibility, without free will.

                "And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal." (Gen. 9:5)

                Blessings,
                Lee
                I don’t see how the behaviour of the ox illustrates the behaviour of God and men. And how is Gen. 9.5, which forbids deliberate homicide, applicable to a goring ox ?

                Unless, of course, one holds that men & oxen are, for moral purposes, and before God, the same kind of entity. Does anyone believe that though ? My cat has scratched me a few times, drawing blood - does that mean she has to be “put to death” ? Over my dead body !

                I am not ridiculing the argument, but trying to see how far it is to be taken.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Leonhard View Post
                  Rationally examining Calvinism, its assumptions, whether they are in tension, what they imply, whether that makes sense, etc... is not to judge God. We know some things of God by the nature of His being. Such as Him being the source of all goodness. And this has implications. I don't know of any theological worldview without tensions or paradoxes, it seems to many of us that Calvinists want to say at the same time that animals don't sin, because they lack free will, that humans have free will, and yet also at the same time that our 'free wills' are completely ordained by God.

                  This among other things has the implication, which is inescapable, that God creates some people so that they can go to Hell for His own glory.

                  That's not something I think that makes sense, given the nature of Goodness itself, or Scripture which clearly teaches that God desires that no one goes to Hell, but that they repent and turn around.

                  Having a discussion about any of that, does not qualify as actively sinning Jedidiah. To say that sounds more like a preacher who wants to shut down discussion.
                  I agree that a critical examination of Calvinism is quite acceptable. Any theology should be subject to question and examination. I was referring to what appeared to me to be implications that God was wrong if Calvinism is accurate. If no one intended such an implication my post was not worthy of response.

                  When, by the way, you are responding to a post you should include the link to the post you responded to rather than a separate quote. You took the longer way to respond. Since it was a long time past when I posted, I almost just ignored your response.
                  Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
                    I agree that a critical examination of Calvinism is quite acceptable. Any theology should be subject to question and examination. I was referring to what appeared to me to be implications that God was wrong if Calvinism is accurate. If no one intended such an implication my post was not worthy of response.

                    ...
                    It's possible I suggested something along those lines. I'm lazy and headachy, and my connection is sluggish, so I'm not going to go back and look.

                    Instead, I'll just say that I generally agree with Roger Olson here. (And FWIW, I also do not recall whether I already posted that link earlier in the thread. Sorry.)
                    Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

                    Beige Federalist.

                    Nationalist Christian.

                    "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

                    Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

                    Proud member of the this space left blank community.

                    Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.

                    Justice for Ashli Babbitt!

                    Justice for Matthew Perna!

                    Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
                      It's possible I suggested something along those lines. I'm lazy and headachy, and my connection is sluggish, so I'm not going to go back and look.

                      Instead, I'll just say that I generally agree with Roger Olson here. (And FWIW, I also do not recall whether I already posted that link earlier in the thread. Sorry.)
                      No ;problem. As long as you do not hold to such a judgement of God I have no disagreement with your post.
                      Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
                        It's possible I suggested something along those lines. I'm lazy and headachy, and my connection is sluggish, so I'm not going to go back and look.

                        Instead, I'll just say that I generally agree with Roger Olson here. (And FWIW, I also do not recall whether I already posted that link earlier in the thread. Sorry.)
                        Your link seems to be broken.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          As I mentioned earlier, I'm not particularly emotionally bothered by the implications of Calvinism. They don't make a lot of sense to me within the context of Christianity, but it's not something I freak out over like many Arminians seem to. But for those who do want to pursue that line of reasoning, I think it would be perfectly reverent to say something like "Calvinism is inconsistent with the character of God as revealed in the Bible".
                          "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post
                            Your link seems to be broken.
                            It's working fine for me.

                            Here are a few prime quotes to throw gas on the fire:

                            "I have openly admitted here that consistent Calvinism turns God into a monster and makes it difficult to tell the difference between God and the devil,..."

                            "I have said that if it were revealed to me in a way I could not doubt that the God of consistent, five point Calvinism is the one true God over all, the maker of heaven and earth, I would not worship him because I would not think him worthy of worship. What makes God worthy of worship is God’s perfect goodness combined with his greatness. God must be both great and good to be worthy of worship."

                            "When I say that Calvinism makes God monstrous and makes it difficult to tell the difference between God and the devil I am talking about from my perspective—not what all Calvinists actually believe. I am talking about the logical implications of Calvinism."
                            Geislerminian Antinomian Kenotic Charispneumaticostal Gender Mutualist-Egalitarian.

                            Beige Federalist.

                            Nationalist Christian.

                            "Everybody is somebody's heretic."

                            Social Justice is usually the opposite of actual justice.

                            Proud member of the this space left blank community.

                            Would-be Grand Vizier of the Padishah Maxi-Super-Ultra-Hyper-Mega-MAGA King Trumpius Rex.

                            Justice for Ashli Babbitt!

                            Justice for Matthew Perna!

                            Arrest Ray Epps and his Fed bosses!

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              The Roger Olson link works fine for me.
                              "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by NorrinRadd View Post
                                It's working fine for me.

                                Here are a few prime quotes to throw gas on the fire:

                                "I have openly admitted here that consistent Calvinism turns God into a monster and makes it difficult to tell the difference between God and the devil,..."

                                "I have said that if it were revealed to me in a way I could not doubt that the God of consistent, five point Calvinism is the one true God over all, the maker of heaven and earth, I would not worship him because I would not think him worthy of worship. What makes God worthy of worship is God’s perfect goodness combined with his greatness. God must be both great and good to be worthy of worship."

                                "When I say that Calvinism makes God monstrous and makes it difficult to tell the difference between God and the devil I am talking about from my perspective—not what all Calvinists actually believe. I am talking about the logical implications of Calvinism."
                                Weird, it's working now but earlier it just said "This page either doesn't exist or was moved".

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
                                32 responses
                                136 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Christianbookworm  
                                Started by KingsGambit, 03-15-2024, 02:12 PM
                                4 responses
                                48 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Thoughtful Monk  
                                Started by Chaotic Void, 03-08-2024, 07:36 AM
                                10 responses
                                119 views
                                1 like
                                Last Post mikewhitney  
                                Started by Cow Poke, 02-29-2024, 07:55 AM
                                14 responses
                                71 views
                                3 likes
                                Last Post Cow Poke  
                                Started by Cow Poke, 02-28-2024, 11:56 AM
                                13 responses
                                58 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Cow Poke  
                                Working...
                                X