Announcement

Collapse

Anthropology 201 Guidelines

Anthropology is the study of groups of people, their beliefs, practices, values, ideas, technologies, languages, economies and more.

All are welcome to post in this section, even Geico Cavemen.

A couple of caveats-- (1) racism has no place in this forum, and (2) please show a little discretion. In other words, if an attachment violates policy on the rest of TWEB, it violates policy in this forum as well, even if it depicts a highly interesting and unique aspect of some obscure culture. Keep it reasonably clean, folks.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Stone tools found in Texas at least 16,000 years old

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stone tools found in Texas at least 16,000 years old

    Source: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/texas-toolmakers-add-debate-over-who-first-americans-were?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=latest-newsletter-v2




    Texas toolmakers add to the debate over who the first Americans were Unearthed spear points and other stone tools go back at least 16,000 years

    © Copyright Original Source


  • #2
    Well, there are alleged global flood fossils common on both sides of the Atlantic dating some 300,000,000 years ago too.
    . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

    . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

    Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
      Source: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/texas-toolmakers-add-debate-over-who-first-americans-were?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=latest-newsletter-v2




      Texas toolmakers add to the debate over who the first Americans were Unearthed spear points and other stone tools go back at least 16,000 years

      © Copyright Original Source

      The whole Clovis culture being the first ones in America is dead and buried.

      I'm always still in trouble again

      "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
      "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
      "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 37818 View Post
        Well, there are alleged global flood fossils common on both sides of the Atlantic dating some 300,000,000 years ago too.
        Odd confusing answer needs explanation. The tools were not found in flood deposits, and where did you get the date 300,000,000 million years ago.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
          Odd confusing answer needs explanation. The tools were not found in flood deposits, and where did you get the date 300,000,000 million years ago.
          Especially since it was announced just a few days ago that the earliest tools found outside of Africa where discovered at the Shangchen palaeolithic archaeological site in Shaanxi, China which date to 2.12 mya.

          Source: Tools from China are oldest hint of human lineage outside Africa


          2.1-million-year-old stone tools suggest hominins reached East Asia much earlier than thought

          Hominins reached Asia at least 2.1 million years ago, researchers assert in an 11 July NatureSource

          © Copyright Original Source


          Story continues at link above

          Source: Hominin occupation of the Chinese Loess Plateau since about 2.1 million years ago


          AbstractSource

          © Copyright Original Source


          I'm always still in trouble again

          "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
          "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
          "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

          Comment


          • #6
            Well, if a global flood occurred some 300,000,000 years ago then any younger finds would be a post era to that flood.
            . . . the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; . . . -- Romans 1:16 KJV

            . . . that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: . . . -- 1 Corinthians 15:3-4 KJV

            Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: . . . -- 1 John 5:1 KJV

            Comment


            • #7
              Honest question, how do you determine a stone tools approx. age of manufacture?
              "What has the Church gained if it is popular, but there is no conviction, no repentance, no power?" - A.W. Tozer

              "... there are two parties in Washington, the stupid party and the evil party, who occasionally get together and do something both stupid and evil, and this is called bipartisanship." - Everett Dirksen

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by 37818 View Post
                Well, if a global flood occurred some 300,000,000 years ago then any younger finds would be a post era to that flood.
                Where did the idea of a world flood 300 million years ago come from? An alien message from space?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Littlejoe View Post
                  Honest question, how do you determine a stone tools approx. age of manufacture?
                  Several possible ways. If they're found at a site that can be dated and if they were used and have traces of organic material on them that could be dated immediately spring to mind.

                  I'm always still in trouble again

                  "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                  "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                  "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Littlejoe View Post
                    Honest question, how do you determine a stone tools approx. age of manufacture?
                    There are new methods that can date the isotopes on oxidation of tools surfaces, but I do not know enough about this method. Stone tools found outside settlements are difficult to date, stone tools at times can be dated by style as with Clovis tools. Enough settlements with Clovis tools have been found to date that style of tool.

                    In this case the tools were found at this continuously occupied site over thousands of years in discrete layers, and this culture and tools is the lowest inhabited layer. There were carbon materials in each layers associated with different tools in each layer. On the site more advanced Clovis tools were found in layers 13,000 years old and it is correlated as roughly the same period as other Clovis sites.. Later layers found settlement and different tools only a few thousand years old.

                    Previously the Clovis culture was the oldest dated culture in America. This is no longer the case.
                    Last edited by shunyadragon; 07-19-2018, 08:15 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This well documented find confirms the following less well documented two finds:

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by shunyadragon View Post
                        This well documented find confirms the following less well documented two finds:
                        IIRC it was the Monte Verde site in South America that really broke open the flood gates concerning the realization that humans were in the Americas prior to the Clovis culture.

                        I'm always still in trouble again

                        "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                        "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                        "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                          IIRC it was the Monte Verde site in South America that really broke open the flood gates concerning the realization that humans were in the Americas prior to the Clovis culture.
                          The Monte Verde site, now dated ~14,800 confirms the model of coastal migration model, and fits the time line of the Texas site, Meadowcroft and Cactus Hill sites.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The Bluefish cave site in the Yukon, Alaska dated ~24,000 also fits the model of coastal migration beginning human presence in America.

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluefish_Caves

                            Comment

                            widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                            Working...
                            X