Time To Smear Kavanaugh's Good Name...

[Cerebrum123]

And Muslims are not Muhammed... Of course it reflects on the image. And I once again note how you all turn your blind eye to what MM just said.

Which is why when arguing against Islam I just use Mohammed's record. More than enough dirt there to discredit him.

[Cow Poke]

Kav is doing a great job answering DiFi's question about him not asking for an FBI investigation. He insists he was anxious to answer the allegations the very NEXT DAY, but instead, it's been 10 days of nonsense and wild allegations... and he reminded her that the FBI does not come to conclusions...

[Charles]

Nope. Your assertion that it was does not make it so.

So let's look at the statement:

"I truly wish I could provide detailed answers to all of the questions that have been and will be asked about how I got to the party, where it took place, and so forth. I don’t have all the answers, and I don’t remember as much as I would like to. But the details about that night that bring me here today are ones I will never forget. They have been seared into my memory and have haunted me episodically as an adult."

I guess we can agree that there is a difference about "the details about that night that bring me here" which would be detials about the sexual assult (if it actually happened) and details about how she got to the party or details about all the questions asked? MM wants to make it appear as if "details" have to be the same in the two cases when it is rather obvious that this is not the case.

I wonder why you feel any need to support MM's claim even if you find it likely that her story is not the truth. That should make it so much easier to adress real problems instead of making them up like MM did.

[Cow Poke]

Here's a pretty good running commentary by APNEWS

[Cow Poke]

So, the Democrats keep howling about an FBI investigation. What that would produce (as Kav pointed out) would be a "302". Here's what that is...

What is a 302?

FBI form FD-302 has space to list the name of the agents, the date of the interview, the name of the interviewee, the place of the interview and so forth. Then it allows the agent to draft a memo—in paragraph form—of what the witness said. It can be one page long or twenty pages long, depending on the length of the interview.

The memo section of a 302 is the key part. This is a combination of what the agent was able to write down during the interview and his recollection. It may list the questions and the answers or simply be a narrative of what the witness said.

The witness generally doesn’t see the 302 or get a chance to correct any mistakes he thinks are in it before it is finalized.

source

Kav explained that "you" (Feinstein) "are doing that right now - it's an interview - you're doing that now"! (may not be the exact wording, but that's the gist)

[Charles]

Chris Wallace puts things in an interesting perspective: http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/09/2...er-republicans

[rogue06]

So, the Democrats keep howling about an FBI investigation. What that would produce (as Kav pointed out) would be a "302". Here's what that is...

What is a 302?

FBI form FD-302 has space to list the name of the agents, the date of the interview, the name of the interviewee, the place of the interview and so forth. Then it allows the agent to draft a memo—in paragraph form—of what the witness said. It can be one page long or twenty pages long, depending on the length of the interview.

The memo section of a 302 is the key part. This is a combination of what the agent was able to write down during the interview and his recollection. It may list the questions and the answers or simply be a narrative of what the witness said.

The witness generally doesn’t see the 302 or get a chance to correct any mistakes he thinks are in it before it is finalized.

source

Kav explained that "you" (Feinstein) "are doing that right now - it's an interview - you're doing that now"! (may not be the exact wording, but that's the gist)

They are all aware of this. They are counting on the public not understanding and falling for their ... poop

[One Bad Pig]

So let's look at the statement:

"I truly wish I could provide detailed answers to all of the questions that have been and will be asked about how I got to the party, where it took place, and so forth. I don’t have all the answers, and I don’t remember as much as I would like to. But the details about that night that bring me here today are ones I will never forget. They have been seared into my memory and have haunted me episodically as an adult."

I guess we can agree that there is a difference about "the details about that night that bring me here" which would be detials about the sexual assult (if it actually happened) and details about how she got to the party or details about all the questions asked? MM wants to make it appear as if "details" have to be the same in the two cases when it is rather obvious that this is not the case.

I wonder why you feel any need to support MM's claim even if you find it likely that her story is not the truth. That should make it so much easier to adress real problems instead of making them up like MM did.

I don't wonder why you feel the need to manufacture this controversy by reading into MM's comments. The irony that you're making up an inconsistency in alleging that MM is making things up is not lost on me.

[RumTumTugger]

Diane Fienstien: "when we get an allegation ...." She apparently sits on it for 6 weeks

[Charles]

I don't wonder why you feel the need to manufacture this controversy by reading into MM's comments. The irony that you're making up an inconsistency in alleging that MM is making things up is not lost on me.

You did read how MM did sum up the part I quoted? He said: "In other words, "I can't remember the details, but I will never forget the details."" http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post578930

MM is clearly making it seem as if different details are the same details. Or how would you explain it (and your accusations are not explanations, don't forget that)?

[Mountain Man]

I'm not able to watch the hearings, but general "grass roots" commentary I'm seeing is that liberals are laughing at Kavanaugh and calling him a sissy boy because he dared to show genuine emotion and anger at the wringer that he and his family have been run through while conservatives are saying that this whole scheme has backfired on the Democrats because it has humanized Kavanaugh, and that he is ripping the Democrat senators to shreds.

[RumTumTugger]

Senator Graham lambasting the Democrats right now about them holding the allegation for 6 weeks.

[Cow Poke]

Wow, Lindsey Graham is showing some spine and calling the Dems out!

[Charles]

I'm not able to watch the hearings, but general "grass roots" commentary I'm seeing is that liberals are laughing at Kavanaugh and calling him a sissy boy because he dared to show genuine emotion and anger at the wringer that he and his family have been run through while conservatives are saying that this whole scheme has backfired on the Democrats because it has humanized Kavanaugh, and that he is ripping the Democrat senators to shreds.

That is the not so charming part about a situation like this that we can all twist and turn our interpretations in order to make it fit in with what we want to believe. Tears can show someone is honest and human or they can show he is a sissy boy depending on how you would like to take it.

[Mountain Man]

Random Tweet:

President Trump is "riveted" and telling people, "This is why I nominated him," in a positive way, per person close to him. Talking to lots of people inside WH about how he likes how Kavanaugh is fighting back. Admires the defiance.