Time To Smear Kavanaugh's Good Name...

[oxmixmudd]

So, you think these 65 women are lying, but the one is telling the truth? They made their statement in writing, and signed their names, Jim.

At least one of them, upon learning what certain comments in the yearbook actually meant about her, is regretting signing that letter right now.


Jim

[seer]

Wow - you don't think they are capable of drafting a letter, Jim? Seriously?

Dumb girls!

[Mountain Man]

...as much as MM thinks he knows, thats just a result of his personal inability to be objective.

How am I not being objective? Because I believe the denials of the witnesses who were named by the accusers themselves?

Again, Jimmy, Ford does not know when the party took place. She doesn't know where it took place. She's told different versions of the story at different times. She's named four people who she claims were there, and all four have said they don't know anything about the party, including Ford's lifelong friend who says she never knew Kavanaugh and never attended a party with him. So I ask again, where's the actionable evidence that would compel an investigation? Where would an investigator even start looking when there is literally nothing to go on?

[Mountain Man]

Wow - you don't think they are capable of drafting a letter, Jim? Seriously?

And does it matter who wrote it? They all put their names on it, so they obviously agree with what was written.

[Mountain Man]

At least one of them, upon learning what certain comments in the yearbook actually meant about her, is regretting signing that letter right now.

Source?

[Cow Poke]

And does it matter who wrote it? They all put their names on it, so they obviously agree with what was written.

So, the Dems are scouring the planet to find people to accuse Kavanaugh, and these women voluntarily come forward from a social media campaign, which shows they were already in touch with each other.

Somehow, the accusers should be believed by default, but these 65 women are lying.

[Cow Poke]

At least one of them, upon learning what certain comments in the yearbook actually meant about her, is regretting signing that letter right now.


Jim

One of the accusers has totally abandoned her accusation.

A former classmate of Christine Blasey Ford tells NPR that she does not know if an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh took place as she first suggested on social media.

"That it happened or not, I have no idea," Cristina King Miranda told NPR's Nina Totenberg. "I can't say that it did or didn't."

That's different from what Miranda wrote Wednesday in a now-deleted Facebook post that stated definitively, "The incident DID happen, many of us heard about it in school."

She flat out LIED, and only recanted when challenged.

[Mountain Man]

OK, this is... just...

Source: Michael Avenatti Locks Account After Admitting Kavanaugh Accuser Might Not Come Forward

Attorney Michael Avenatti said his client might now not come forward against Brett Kavanaugh, and then locked his Twitter public profile from view.

After two days of ginning up publicity with the news he has a “100 percent credible” accuser against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, adding that she has “multiple witnesses to corroborate her story” and that she is “willing to take a polygraph,” Avenatti appeared to walk back that assurance in a Tuesday morning tweet.

“Let me be clear: We will disclose the client’s name and accusations only when SHE is ready and we have adequate security measures in place. And not a moment before that,” Avenatti tweeted. “It is her choice and hers alone as to when to surface bc it is her life. We expect it within the next 36 hrs.”

A few minutes after this apparent walk back, where he appears to be blaming the woman if he does not deliver what he promised, Avenatti, the attorney for porn star Stormy Daniels made famous by CNN, locked public access to his Twitter account.

https://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-come-forward/

© Copyright Original Source

I keep saying it, but you can't make this up!

[Cow Poke]

Then....

"many of us heard about it in school," and that it was talked about for days afterward.

Now...

To all media, I will not be doing anymore interviews. No more circus. To clarify my post: I do not have first hand knowledge of the incident that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford mentions, and I stand by my support for Christine. That's it. I don't have more to say on the subject.

— Cristina King Miranda (@reinabori) September 19, 2018

Absolute flat out lie admitted.

[JimL]

It took me about 45 seconds to find the answer, Jim...

When word of a high-school-era sexual misconduct allegation against Kavanaugh emerged last Thursday afternoon, Meghan McCaleb and her husband, Scott, thought they and other high school friends of the nominee needed to speak out. Meghan McCaleb said she launched the letter-writing effort after discussing it with some of Kavanaugh’s former law clerks.

She said she contacted friends, who contacted more friends, and they had 65 signatures by the next morning.

Source=APNews

So what, who the heck is Meghan McCaleb? She, supposedly a high school friend, got together with Kavanaughs law clerks and devised this letter and had it signed by 65 women all in just one day after the allegation was made. C'mon CP. You buy that? And btw, Dr. Ford also had a letter signed by many who knew her at the time and support her as well. Does that confirm anything?

Also, James Roche, Kavanaughs roomate at the time, says he wouldn't doubt that Kavanaugh, who was known to be a big drinker, would do what is alleged of him. Doesn't make it so either, but Kavanaughs portrayal of himself as a choir boy at the time is highly questionable as well.

[Cow Poke]

Source?

It looks like he's referring to this

[Cow Poke]

So what, who the heck is Meghan McCaleb?

She's a woman, Jim, whose testimony is just as valid as Dr Ford's.

She, supposedly a high school friend, got together with Kavanaughs law clerks and devised this letter and had it signed by 65 women all in just one day after the allegation was made. C'mon CP. You buy that?

I'm linked with hundreds of people from my high school days, Jim - and that was over 45 years ago. We have, on more than a few occasions, banded together for causes that interest us, often on a moment's notice. This is, indeed, the social media age.

And btw, Dr. Ford also had a letter signed by many who knew her at the time and support her as well. Does that confirm anything?

Source, please?

[Cow Poke]

Also, James Roche, Kavanaughs roomate at the time, says he wouldn't doubt that Kavanaugh, who was known to be a big drinker, would do what is alleged of him. Doesn't make it so either, but Kavanaughs portrayal of himself as a choir boy at the time is highly questionable as well.

That part concerns me. I haven't heard Kavanaugh deny any account of drinking, but that doesn't mean he's a sexual predator. Nor does Roche attest that Kavanaugh is - he just says he (Roche) believes Kavanaugh is capable of that, and he believes Ford.

In all fairness, here is that article, as well.

[Mountain Man]

So what, who the heck is Meghan McCaleb? She, supposedly a high school friend, got together with Kavanaughs law clerks and devised this letter and had it signed by 65 women all in just one day after the allegation was made. C'mon CP. You buy that? And btw, Dr. Ford also had a letter signed by many who knew her at the time and support her as well. Does that confirm anything?

What do you find so unbelievable about it? In this day and age of Facebook and social media, it's easy to stay connected with dozens of people and contact every one of them in seconds with a single message.

As for this claim: "And btw, Dr. Ford also had a letter signed by many who knew her at the time and support her as well."

trump wrong.jpg

Dimbulb referenced that earlier, and it turns out that it was an open letter that anyone can sign posted to a sketchy website that throws up a browser security warning if you try to visit it and was signed by people who have no personal association with sketchy Ms. Ford, and the letter doesn't even reference her sketchy accusations against Kavanaugh. Sparko dismantled it here:

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post576621
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post576623

[Mountain Man]

That part concerns me. I haven't heard Kavanaugh deny any account of drinking, but that doesn't mean he's a sexual predator. Nor does Roche attest that Kavanaugh is - he just says he (Roche) believes Kavanaugh is capable of that, and he believes Ford.

In all fairness, here is that article, as well.

Actually, that's referring to a different incident, the one that allegedly happened at Yale. As usual with salacious political gossip, you find the truth buried deep in the article, far below the misleading bullet points that lead off the story.

First, Roche says he wasn't an eyewitness:

"Roche claims that although he did not witness the alleged incident, he was inclined to agree with Ramirez based on his experience around Kavanaugh."

Secondly, he says that he "did not interact with Kavanaugh 'beyond the first few days of freshman year'".

Yet we're supposed to believe that he has some deep insight into Kavanaugh's character despite openly conceding that he barely knew the guy.

Original story from Business Insider: https://www.businessinsider.com/bret...egation-2018-9