Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Wears $3,500 Outfit

[mossrose]

Are you calling me a liar?

I think you are so deluded that you don't even know what you say.

I think you're the worst person on this site, so I find it difficult to believe that it's the other people on this site that have brought you down.

You are so arrogant and full of yourself. Do you really think that I care about what you think about me?

As I said, it says something about you that you interpret it that way. You attribute such character failings on your part to years dealing with bad people. Okay. But they are still character failings on your part whatever their origins.

Rave on.

[Leonhard]

Also 2, D, and 6, seem to be spot on. And if its C then the whole thing is moot.

Should have been

"Also D, and 6, seem to be spot on. And if its 2, or C then the whole thing is moot."

[JimL]

Ah, the Gold Standard of TRUTH!



Yes, all politicians tell the truth 100% of the time - especially when they get caught in a flap.

Aren't you the guy who is always harping on about waiting for the evidence before convicting, particularly in the case of Trump and his band of thieves? I guess that principle only applies when you want it to, eh?

[Cow Poke]

I think you are so deluded that you don't even know what you say.

I think, from time to time, he just loves being nasty.

[mossrose]

I think, from time to time, he just loves being nasty.

I think he thinks that he is so much better than anybody else that he can get away with anything.

And when he's called on it, he will turn it around and say, "that's not what I meant, it's your fault".

And he just loves being nasty.

[rogue06]

There's not much to explain. Someone's personal spending habits have nothing to do with federal and corporate financial equality laws/regulations/systems.

I doubt it was "her spending habits" since your average bartender/waitress/social activist generally doesn't have the money laying around to go out and buy a $3500 outfit.

[rogue06]

AOC didn't get to keep the clothes, do keep up.

So she's a fake for a photo shoot. Okay.


Next she'll claim someone made her do it.

[Cow Poke]

So she's a fake for a photo shoot. Okay.


Next she'll claim someone made her do it.

flip.jpg

[Psychic Missile]

I doubt it was "her spending habits" since your average bartender/waitress/social activist generally doesn't have the money laying around to go out and buy a $3500 outfit.

It really doesn't matter how she came to wear it, it has nothing to do with socialism.

[Starlight]

I think, from time to time, he just loves being nasty.

That describes Mossrose well IMO.

[rogue06]

It really doesn't matter how she came to wear it, it has nothing to do with socialism.

It's all about optics. It looks like she is quickly becoming part of what she claims to be against^[1]. And she hasn't even been elected.

It's like the early union bosses who originally were little different from the workers they represented but within a decade or two, were dressing like the company owners, vacationing in the same places as the company owners, sending their kids to the same schools as the company owners, living in mansions like the company owners...





1. It is questionable how much she really believes what she espouses in that just a few years ago when she was trying to start up a business she was a vocal supporter of giving businesses tax breaks.

[Cow Poke]

That describes Mossrose well IMO.

You can be a decent fellow, Star - but you seem to allow nastiness to come out far too easily. I think mossy is just really tired of some of your past antics.

[Psychic Missile]

It's all about optics. It looks like she is quickly becoming part of what she claims to be against^[1]. And she hasn't even been elected.

It's like the early union bosses who originally were little different from the workers they represented but within a decade or two, were dressing like the company owners, vacationing in the same places as the company owners, sending their kids to the same schools as the company owners, living in mansions like the company owners...

1. It is questionable how much she really believes what she espouses in that just a few years ago when she was trying to start up a business she was a vocal supporter of giving businesses tax breaks.

Buying or using expensive things has nothing to do with socialist principals, so the "optics" don't matter. Personal choices have nothing to do with corporate and government policy. And why do conservatives care about socialist D candidate optics?

[rogue06]

Buying or using expensive things has nothing to do with socialist principals, so the "optics" don't matter. Personal choices have nothing to do with corporate and government policy. And why do conservatives care about socialist D candidate optics?

Because it is quickly becoming apparent that she is nothing more than yet another do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do hypocritical politician who even before she's elected to any office is being sucked into becoming exactly what she claims to oppose.

[JimL]

Because it is quickly becoming apparent that she is nothing more than yet another do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do hypocritical politician who even before she's elected to any office is being sucked into becoming exactly what she claims to oppose.

The problem is that you are confused as to what it is that she opposes, and or supports. Figure that out first, then make your argument. Hint, it has nothing at all to do with how much money any one individual can make or spend or what they wear on any particular occasion.