Originally posted by firstfloor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Deep State
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostSo instead of casting shade at you should be aware that it is your own community that is regularly expanding the acronym until it has become an unmanageable jumble. IOW, it's yet another face plant for Tass and starlight.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostAfter that word salad we are still left with the fact that it is the gay community itself that is turning the acronym into an alphabet soup jumble and to pretend that is somehow 's fault are asinine.Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostIn fairness, the poker of cows does tend to make up mocking variants of said alphabet soup, which is doubtless what starlight is alluding to.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostHere in the U.S. there are a number of gays that don't think LGBT is inclusive enough and needs to expand the acronym to add things like Q for queer, A for asexual, P for pansexual and K for kink etc. This was why the University of Wisconsin – Madison changed the name of their "LGBT Center" to the "Gender and Sexuality Campus Center."“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostAh, my mistake. And here's me thinking CP was mocking homosexuals with his “LBGQTRXSCJ” alphabet soup when all he was doing was seriously trying to be thoughtful and correct. Of course he was.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostNot "nonsense"
But, go ahead and do the "rolling your big empty head" thing - that is becoming your trademark. That, and "NONSENSE!!!!!!!!"The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostIt's so easy arguing with CP because he never says anything."Yes. President Trump is a huge embarrassment. And it’s an embarrassment to evangelical Christianity that there appear to be so many who will celebrate precisely the aspects that I see Biblically as most lamentable and embarrassing." Southern Baptist leader Albert Mohler Jr.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostHe is yet to realize that you need to provide reasons not just opinions.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charles View PostHe is yet to realize that you need to provide reasons not just opinions.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostThat's all he's got, this is why he is reduced to mocking sound-bites so often.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
The government “is under siege” by appointees who are under-prepared, unsuited for their duties, in it for themselves, and ideologically hellbent on dismantling the federal government with little idea or care about the consequences, Lewis writes.“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostAbout 3 hours through The Fifth Risk. Well worth reading or listening to and relevant to this topic.
Rick Perry, of course, infamously wanted to abolish the Department of Energy (but couldn't remember its name) until he was appointed by Trump as secretary of the department and discovered it was actually the department of managing nuclear weapons and nuclear contamination. People think the Department of Commerce is about business and economics and don't realize it's actually mostly Weather Forecasting, Patents, and Census administration. And people think the Department of Agriculture is something about farms, and don't realize it's primarily about food assistance programs such as SNAP, and secondarily about helping rural people with housing. And that's only the 3 federal departments covered by the book... 15 exist in total.
I think the existence of libertarianism as a political philosophy in the US (to an extent it doesn't exist in other Western countries) is a product of the profound ignorance of most Americans as to what things their government actually does. If you don't know what the government is doing / assume it isn't doing much, then the question of "why even bother to have a government at all?" seems sensible. So they like "small government". But if you actually were to take the same person down a long check-list of things the government is currently doing, and ask for each individual item whether they thought it should happen or not, you'd get a very different answer, starting with "should the government manage its arsenal of nuclear weapons?" At the end of the checklist, people might still have different ideas about the total size they want government to be, but they'd be fewer morons saying "why don't we just not have a government?""I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostRick Perry, of course, infamously wanted to abolish the Department of Energy (but couldn't remember its name)
until he was appointed by Trump as secretary of the department and discovered it was actually the department of managing nuclear weapons and nuclear contamination.
Sure, Perry changed his mind on getting rid of it, and perhaps there's room for criticism in that about-face, but it wasn't because he somehow wasn't aware of what it did.
I think the existence of libertarianism as a political philosophy in the US (to an extent it doesn't exist in other Western countries) is a product of the profound ignorance of most Americans as to what things their government actually does. If you don't know what the government is doing / assume it isn't doing much, then the question of "why even bother to have a government at all?" seems sensible. So they like "small government". But if you actually were to take the same person down a long check-list of things the government is currently doing, and ask for each individual item whether they thought it should happen or not, you'd get a very different answer, starting with "should the government manage its arsenal of nuclear weapons?" At the end of the checklist, people might still have different ideas about the total size they want government to be, but they'd be fewer morons saying "why don't we just not have a government?"
Also, while there might be some who are unaware that the Department of Energy handles nuclear material in addition to more general energy stuff, most people I've seen actually advocate the abolition of the Department of Energy are aware of it handling nuclear-related matters, they just want that part of it put under a different part of the government's purview (unless we're talking about anarchists, who I assume would want the government to get rid of the nuclear weapons on its way out, but I'll admit I haven't really looked much at the anarchists think, mostly because I don't really care what anarchists think).
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
|
6 responses
45 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Yesterday, 08:38 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
|
42 responses
230 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Yesterday, 03:53 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
|
24 responses
104 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Ronson
Yesterday, 02:40 PM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
|
32 responses
173 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Yesterday, 08:22 AM | ||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
|
73 responses
285 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 03:51 AM |
Comment