Voter ID Redux

[One Bad Pig]

Update:

[carpedm9587]

the New Georgia Project, an organization founded by Kemp's opponent, Stacey Abrams, herself in 2014. Their intentional and repeated sloppiness is apparently well-known with local registration officials. But when you swamp the officials with difficult-to-make-out information, and you slow their validation efforts, you get to make impactful public statements like this:

https://politics.myajc.com/news/stat...Y0AjUQ8b9RgTN/

So from this you are inferring malicious intent?

This appears to be another effort to mind-read others. It could just as easily be a "get-out-the-vote" effort to try to bolster the voters for one party or the other. Get-out-the-vote efforts are usually staffed by volunteers who may or may not be well trained, may or may not be coordinated to avoid duplication, etc. Assuming that the results were maliciously intended is not, as far as I can see, justified.

[rogue06]

Meanwhile...

Source: 58,000 non-U.S. citizens may have voted in at least one election here, election official says

ELECTION FRAUDELECTION ADVISORYSource

© Copyright Original Source

The article ends with a 2 minute video of Minnie Barela, a blind 76-year-old Fort Worth woman, who said a woman recently indicted in connection with an organized voter fraud ring had knocked on her door in 2016 and offered to help her vote.

[Bill the Cat]

So from this you are inferring malicious intent?

You asked for an answer. I gave it.

I'd like to see some source material relevant to this claim.

That's the source material. It was not my commentary.

[carpedm9587]

Meanwhile...

Source: 58,000 non-U.S. citizens may have voted in at least one election here, election official says

ELECTION FRAUDELECTION ADVISORYSource

© Copyright Original Source

The article ends with a 2 minute video of Minnie Barela, a blind 76-year-old Fort Worth woman, who said a woman recently indicted in connection with an organized voter fraud ring had knocked on her door in 2016 and offered to help her vote.

To be clear folks - these names have been forwarded for investigation as "possible voter fraud." The statement that 58,000 DID vote" is false. The investigation is not complete. The existence of false duplicates has not yet been ruled out. As usual, the "voter fraud" advocates are getting ahead of the story more than just a bit.

[carpedm9587]

You asked for an answer. I gave it.

But it doesn't actually prove/show what you think it proves/shows. You are assuming intent without an ability to show that was actually the case.

That's the source material. It was not my commentary.

The commentary is not yours - the assumption of intent is.

[Bill the Cat]

But it doesn't actually prove/show what you think it proves/shows. You are assuming intent without an ability to show that was actually the case.

It shows exactly what I said. They swamped the registrar's office just before the election with thousands of poorly filled out registrations.

The commentary is not yours - the assumption of intent is.

No it isn't.

[One Bad Pig]

To be clear folks - these names have been forwarded for investigation as "possible voter fraud." The statement that 58,000 DID vote" is false. The investigation is not complete. The existence of false duplicates has not yet been ruled out. As usual, the "voter fraud" advocates are getting ahead of the story more than just a bit.

To be clear, you're doing some pretty heavy damage control here. The usual "nothing to see here, folks" people are doing their damnedest to cast doubt on the findings. How many "false duplicates" do you think there could possibly be?

[carpedm9587]

It shows exactly what I said. They swamped the registrar's office just before the election with thousands of poorly filled out registrations.

Which can be due to any number of reasons - not necessarily "a desire to then accuse the registry of intentionally denying the vote."

No it isn't.

Since you cited this as an example of, "It's almost if they do it on purpose just so they get set aside in order to have something to protest about," I would suggest that you are indeed inferring intent.