This is the kind of thing being pushed by the right and Republicans that earns them the reputation for working to disenfranchise voters that don't vote Republican. At issue is a simple problem: the voter ID law (as implemented) requires the Voter ID to provide a street address. But the USPS does not provide home delivery in many autonomous reservations, and many of the people living within them don't necessarily live on streets in the conventional sense. So all they have is a P.O. Box. But the Republicans have pushed the courts to reject mailing address in favor of street address, effectively disenfranchising tens of thousands of Native American voters in North Dakota. Given the tightness of the race in that state, this is highly likely to shift the tide in favor of the Republican challenger.
"Win at any cost" - even unethical and unscrupulous strategies - should not be the approach of EITHER political party. If you cannot win on the merits of your arguments, winning by stacking the deck is simply unacceptable, IMO
"Win at any cost" - even unethical and unscrupulous strategies - should not be the approach of EITHER political party. If you cannot win on the merits of your arguments, winning by stacking the deck is simply unacceptable, IMO
Comment