Kanye West the Token Negro

[Littlejoe]

Ok, I think it is fair to conclude that you have got no arguments or at least you are unwilling to share them and go for personal attacks instead. You could not show an instance of you discussing what is right and wrong in and of itself. Quite telling. Personal attacks wont help your case.

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post583215

and then:

http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...l=1#post583666

the fact that you haven't addressed his documented arguments means you are unwilling to discuss the issue raised in the OP.

[RumTumTugger]

Ok, I think it is fair to conclude that you have got no arguments or at least you are unwilling to share them and go for personal attacks instead. You could not show an instance of you discussing what is right and wrong in and of itself. Quite telling. Personal attacks wont help your case.

Translation: I don't have an answer to the arguments you make so I need to derail this thread in hopes that people won't notice.

[One Bad Pig]

Translation: I don't have an answer to the arguments you make so I need to derail this thread in hopes that people won't notice.

Nah. Charles isn't here to provide answers. He's here to nag the right. Yes, Charles, I know. You're minded to accuse me of name-calling here. Will you go ahead and prove my prediction right, even after you've seen this?

[RumTumTugger]

Nah. Charles isn't here to provide answers. He's here to nag the right. Yes, Charles, I know. You're minded to accuse me of name-calling here. Will you go ahead and prove my prediction right, even after you've seen this?

In otherwords he is here to hold the water for the likes of Starlight, Tass, and JimL so they don't have to admit they can't reply to the facts and arguments Rogue made.

[Tassman]

And you don't even realize how racist your statement is, do you?

I'm not racist, whereas Trump has a long history of making racially controversial remarks and taking racist actions. I referred to some, there are many other well documented examples.

In otherwords he is here to hold the water for the likes of Starlight, Tass, and JimL so they don't have to admit they can't reply to the facts and arguments Rogue made.

Rogue didn't make an argument. He did his usual filibuster of selected statements to support his case on his usual false notion that' lots and lots of words make him right.

[One Bad Pig]

Rogue didn't make an argument. He did his usual filibuster of selected statements to support his case on his usual false notion that' lots and lots of words make him right.

This is spectacularly off base. I notice you didn't bother to refute his statements or introduce contrary mitigating facts, but went straight to misrepresentation and fallacious accusation.

I'll wait patiently for Charles to nanny you regarding that.

[One Bad Pig]

In otherwords he is here to hold the water for the likes of Starlight, Tass, and JimL so they don't have to admit they can't reply to the facts and arguments Rogue made.

No, he's not here for that.

[Zymologist]

Rogue didn't make an argument, he just provided a bunch of statements trying to make his case.

[Cow Poke]

This is spectacularly off base. I notice you didn't bother to refute his statements or introduce contrary mitigating facts, but went straight to misrepresentation and fallacious accusation.

I'll wait patiently for Charles to nanny you regarding that.

Might as well wait for the hot place to have a snow storm.

[Tassman]

This is spectacularly off base. I notice you didn't bother to refute his statements or introduce contrary mitigating facts, but went straight to misrepresentation and fallacious accusation.

It is up to rogue to summarise his cherry-picked 30+ paragraph diatribe. If this was a university thesis or essay he would be failed, because he's not even pretending to provide a balanced argument. He's attempting, as he so often does, to beat the rest of us into submission.

[rogue06]

Rogue didn't make an argument, he just provided a bunch of statements trying to make his case.

Which they won't even try to refute or counter simply because they know that they can't. So instead they whine that I provide way too much evidence to support my case or like chuckles, flail about desperately trying to change the subject.

[Sparko]

I'm not racist,

That's what all you racists say. Next you will tell us that some of your best friends are black.

[Sparko]

In otherwords he is here to hold the water for the likes of Starlight, Tass, and JimL so they don't have to admit they can't reply to the facts and arguments Rogue made.

You are making it worse by engaging him and talking about him. Just ignore him or move the nanny posts to Chuck's Car.

[One Bad Pig]

It is up to rogue to summarise his cherry-picked 30+ paragraph diatribe. If this was a university thesis or essay he would be failed, because he's not even pretending to provide a balanced argument. He's attempting, as he so often does, to beat the rest of us into submission.

So, in your opinion, rogue's presentation is both too long AND too short!

I'm beginning to question your intelligence, Tassman, because you complain something that fits into a single post here is so long you need a summary and can't even seem to understand what rogue is doing with his presentation. The irony of your parting accusation is rich, given your penchant for repeating the same thing in post after post in quite emphatic terms.

[Sparko]

So, in your opinion, rogue's presentation is both too long AND too short!

I'm beginning to question your intelligence, Tassman, because you complain something that fits into a single post here is so long you need a summary and can't even seem to understand what rogue is doing with his presentation. The irony of your parting accusation is rich, given your penchant for repeating the same thing in post after post in quite emphatic terms.

really. This is a debate thread not an essay. It is up to Tassman to argue the other point of view if he doesn't like what rogue said.

But we all know he can't do that, so whine, whine, whine. Ad hominem rather than cogent response to the points.