Originally posted by Tassman
View Post
Why have you "explained away the validity of thought" by positing a mechanistic explanation. Everything else in the Natural Universe has a "mechanistic explanation", why not consciousness?
Who says that "Every brain, every mind is a point of supernatural activity"?
Many animals have self awareness, i.e possess consciousness. Are they too at a point of alleged "supernatural activity"?
But what is not up for debate is the taking of the validity of thought as an axiom, it cannot be the conclusion of a proof.
Best wishes,
Lee
Comment