Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

What is Socialism?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is Socialism?

    My brother shared this excellent video on Facebook from Gloria Alvarez, a Guatamalan Author and Political Commentator, who during an interview explains what Socialism is, and what the problems with it are. She makes some excellent points.

    She starts about 2:50 into the interview.





  • #2
    That was good, especially about bureaucrats not being held responsible for their screw ups...
    Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by seer View Post
      That was good, especially about bureaucrats not being held responsible for their screw ups...
      She also explains why socialism has never worked. The bureaucrats take care of themselves with your money and think they know what is best for everyone but even with good intentions they can't get it right.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Sparko View Post
        She also explains why socialism has never worked. The bureaucrats take care of themselves with your money and think they know what is best for everyone but even with good intentions they can't get it right.
        Exactly... But I'm afraid, that demographically, that is what we are headed for in this country.
        Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by seer View Post
          Exactly... But I'm afraid, that demographically, that is what we are headed for in this country.
          yeah, and her talking about how the socialists cement their power by creating all those government jobs so everyone depends on them and can't vote them out is pretty prescient too.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sparko View Post
            yeah, and her talking about how the socialists cement their power by creating all those government jobs so everyone depends on them and can't vote them out is pretty prescient too.
            Yep, that is exactly what has happened in my state...
            Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

            Comment


            • #7
              That video is ignorant drivel. She mis-describes "socialism of the 21st century" as being about central planning when it's the exact opposite, quotes socialist George Orwell as if he was against socialism, and in general rambles about obvious problems of central planning as if that was what socialism was about. What a moron.
              "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
              "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
              "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                That video is ignorant drivel. She mis-describes "socialism of the 21st century" as being about central planning when it's the exact opposite, quotes socialist George Orwell as if he was against socialism, and in general rambles about obvious problems of central planning as if that was what socialism was about. What a moron.
                You're on a roll tonight, Star. Did you flunk your urine test or something?
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by seer View Post
                  Exactly... But I'm afraid, that demographically, that is what we are headed for in this country.
                  Democratic socialism, seer, democratic socialism.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm usually not interested in people talking about merits or demerits of socialism, since the term will mean different things to different people at different times and in different parts of the world. I watched the video anyway to give it a chance. I'm going to assume that the type of socialism they both describe is a fair and accurate description. Here are my thoughts:

                    It's strange to hear someone from Guatemala talk about the benefits of capitalism compared to socialism, considering the cost in lives capitalism has had in that country.

                    The interviewer says that if Sanders was elected the USA could have become socialist.

                    The argument is made that capitalist participants, "the baker", know better than bureaucrats. In the US government, the baker can be elected to office, appointed to a position, or act as an advisor. How is socialism any different?

                    She says that because "absolute power corrupts absolutely", socialist bureaucracy is unstable, but how is that not just as true for especially dominant capitalists? What's the difference between Castro or Chavez and the Koch brothers or Bezos?

                    "If a bureaucrat makes a mistake his bank account is not affected." "With capitalism, if you don't serve the wants and needs of your customers, you lose your own money." Then what are corporations for? What about CEOs who ruin a company and jump ship with a golden parachute to the next company?

                    And it ends with the moronic idea that people who talk about government provided programs as "free" don't know what taxes are.
                    Last edited by Psychic Missile; 11-14-2018, 10:14 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      Did you flunk your urine test
                      I don't get the reference.

                      I read Marx and Marxism last month which is an interesting historical survey of socialism published this year, which filled a bit of a gap in my knowledge, because while I tend to personally engage a lot with modern democratic socialists I hadn't read much on the history of socialism (to a significant extent because I don't view the history as particularly important).

                      One of the big takeaways I got from it is that Marx himself isn't necessarily all that helpful or clear in his own works. He lived during a time when the French had decided that feudalism sucked and had cut the heads off their nobles and moved to capitalism in the hope that this would usher in an age of "Liberty, Equality, Brotherhood"... and it hadn't particularly done so. Marx fancied himself a philosopher and set out to answer the question of "what is it about Capitalism that makes life suck for the workers almost as much as it did under Feudalism?" in a deep philosophical way using fairly abstract terms. To the question of why there was no sense of brotherhood among men, he pointed out that capitalism fosters competition among workers as it forces them to compete with each other to get jobs and for pay rises, and their managers boss them around much like the feudal lords before them did. Thus, rather than promote friendliness and brotherhood, capitalism "alienates" (one of his favorite terms) men from one another. He thought that due to capitalism, wealth inequality was going to spiral out of control, and eventually the workers would get sick of the inequality and break out the pitchforks much as they had done for the nobles of the feudal system. This, he thought, would lead to some sort of post-Capitalist system that he called "socialism" but he wasn't very clear on what it was particularly, other than that workers would have it better and there would be more sense of brotherhood among them.

                      Marx tended towards abstract philosophical discussions rather than practical analysis, but insofar as he had clear practical ideas of how to improve the situation, his suggestions included progressive income tax and estate tax, both of which were fairly universally implemented after the Great Depression in most Western countries. In general, he didn't advocate many particular practical steps to improve society or to create any sort of socialist utopia, but preferred to waffle with vague philosophical language about the problems of capitalism and how it "alienated" humanity from one another. For Marx himself "socialism" is sort of a very vague and undefined idea meaning something like "a society where workers have it better than they do currently, and are more friendly toward each other and there is a sense of universal brotherhood among humanity". Insofar as Marx's Socialism goes, it is not really clear in Marx's thinking the extent to which the government might or might not have any particular role in doing it, or whether it is something that arises over time via grassroots as workers think more about their situation and there are social shifts to change things etc. His works are very long, very waffly, and he changed his mind on many things over the course of his life.

                      This vague concept of Socialism itself had predated Marx, and there were many and various contemporaries of him coming up with a wide variety of different ideas about what Socialism might or might not be. Their ideas included "hey, let's start a commune and share all our stuff" to "our local workplace should be a co-operative where all the workers have a share in ownership" to "let's form a political party and try and get the government to pass some legislation to make life better for workers" to "let's support labour unions". So there was a huge variety among "socialists" in the early 20th century, because there was nothing remotely like any single clear Socialism. There was no agreement as to whether they needed government involvement or participation, and among those who thought they needed government assistance, no agreement as to what political strategy would be most useful getting that assistance.

                      Then along came Lenin, who had read some of Marx's writings and had various other influences, and had his own bright ideas about how to create a Socialist Utopia. He decided to do it in his native Russia. Most other Socialists at the time laughed at the idea, because Socialism was widely viewed by them as being a Post-Capitalist phase of society, and Russia was dirt-poor pre-capitalist society, so it wasn't the right type of country to do socialism in. Nonetheless, the disinterest of the rest of the world's Socialists didn't stop Lenin successfully leading a takeover of the country and doing the chopping-heads-off-nobles thing, and then declaring himself the leader of the country. But, okay... what then? How does one join the dots from "I am now leader of a country" to "some sort of Socialism is successfully implemented in that country"? What policies might one implement? Lenin had a variety of ideas. Firstly he developed a new idea of the "Party" (not a Marx term). Marx had waffled abstractly and vaguely about a possible future post-capitalist pre-socialist transitional phase of society involving "the dictatorship of the proletariat" which can be reasonably translated by the modern phrase "tyranny of the majority in a democracy". Lenin decided that the "Party" represented the people of his society, and he was the head of the Party, and hence that he himself as dictator represented all the people and hence democracy was summed up in him, and "dictatorship of the proletariat" Totally Meant He Should Be Dictator. That was very convenient for him. Also he decided that the Communist Party represented workers and hence anyone who said anything at all bad about The Party was inherently against all the people in general, and thus was a bad person inherently who should be punished for their criminality. Having established himself a nice dictatorship, he largely declared victory, and sat on his laurels as having achieved the great Socialist Utopia. Anyone who thought he hadn't done so within Russia was silenced with force, and socialists outside Russia, such as George Orwell, mocked him (Orwell wrote Animal Farm satirizing this Russian "socialism" by pointing out it was a pretty standard feudal dictatorship and there was minimal difference to capitalism/feudalism).

                      Lenin decided that in order to become properly socialist, Russia needed to advance from its pre-capitalist state, into capitalism, before it could emerge out the other side into a socialist society. So he decided to rush that change as fast as possible, by industrializing as quickly as possible. So in an extremely short time-span Russia went from having mostly a bunch of peasant farmers into a massive industrial revolution. Conditions for workers in the factories, were, ironically much much worse than they typically were under capitalism or feudalism, with little or no interest paid by the Party to the miserable conditions of their workers. When Stalin took over from Lenin, he happily took up the mantle of brutal dictator, and proceeded to kill everyone he didn't like. A reasonably similar pattern played out in China under Mao.

                      The general view of Socialists in the West was that these things were not really Socialism and not really all that interesting. Crazy dictators were crazy dictators, and certainly nothing they were doing appeared to be improving the situation of the workers or particularly benefiting their people in general. Meanwhile the socialists in the West focused on things like labour unions, progressive income taxes, healthcare for all, minimum wages, paid sick leave and vacation time, and generally improving the situation of the worker and the average person. The typical terms used to distinguish these vast differences, are those in the Western are "democratic socialists" or "social democrats", while the Lenin/Stalin/Mao dictatorship is "communism". Thus "democratic socialism" and "communism" are two almost entirely different schools of thought in the wider umbrella of "socialism" and have very very little in common and often little interest in each other.

                      To jump forward to the present day, my country's current Prime Minister used to be the president of the International Union of Socialist Youth the purpose of which is "the promotion of democracy, human rights, and youth policy... to advocate for equal opportunities and the right to social and political participation for youth all over the world". One of the US's top socialist professors spends most of his time talking about the value of co-operatives where the workers have partial ownership of the business and participate in democratic processes inside their own workplace to elect their managers etc, which Marx at one point in his rambling writings lists as the most important issue in his view. Bernie Sanders, the US's most-liked politician, and democratic socialist, focuses on getting Medicare for All, and wants to do other things to help workers like increase the minimum wage to a living wage and strengthen unions.

                      Insofar as the OP is a ramble about some of the problems with central planning (something Lenin used to try and speed fast through the process of industrialization), okay then, don't have central planning. ~shrug~ It's not particularly relevant to socialism in general.
                      Last edited by Starlight; 11-14-2018, 11:07 PM.
                      "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                      "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                      "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        For those more interested in youtube vids like in the OP, here's a good discussion of socialism by a present-day US university professor:



                        It's reasonably long, so I suggest watching at 2x speed. To some extent the Q&A after the talk is more focused than the actual talk.
                        Last edited by Starlight; 11-15-2018, 12:13 AM.
                        "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                        "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                        "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          An amusing but potentially useful way of thinking about Marx himself, I think, is to interpret him as if he were a Science Fiction writer (which, of course, hadn't yet been invented in his day). He imagines a distant future where things are different due to technological changes and social changes, and imagines it to be a nice place where workers have it good, and he thinks the eventual course of history will take society to that place. But he doesn't lay out the 12-step plan for getting to that place, anymore than the Star Trek writers lay out the 12-step plan for how we can/should turn our society into that of Star Trek.

                          One of the biggest differences between Marx himself and his own contemporaries in the wider Socialist movement of the time, is Marx's view that technological change ("dialectical materialism" in over-philosophized Marxian terminology) is the primary driver of social changes and changes in the workforce, and his view that changing technology in the future would be the main impetus of progress.

                          His focus on technological change coupled with his vague imaginings of the attributes that future societies might have, rather than his laying out the exact path for changing a current society into a hypothetical future one, makes him more like a modern Sci-fi author IMO than a modern political activist. But he is more interested in the types of attributes this future society might have (e.g. "lack of alienation" between people, or between people and their work) than he is in telling any specific story within that society like a modern Sci-fi author would. If he'd actually managed to combine his ideas with the plot of a story, e.g. as Ayn Rand did in Atlas Shrugged, his works might actually be worth reading / an interesting read today. As it is, even I as a self-professed "socialist" and fan of Sci-fi, have zero interest in actually trying to slog through his over-philosophized works.
                          "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                          "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                          "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Starlight View Post
                            That video is ignorant drivel. She mis-describes "socialism of the 21st century" as being about central planning when it's the exact opposite, quotes socialist George Orwell as if he was against socialism, and in general rambles about obvious problems of central planning as if that was what socialism was about. What a moron.
                            Wow with that endorsement, I am even more confident in her description of socialism as true.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by JimL View Post
                              Democratic socialism, seer, democratic socialism.
                              An oxymoron.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
                              16 responses
                              136 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post One Bad Pig  
                              Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                              53 responses
                              354 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Mountain Man  
                              Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                              25 responses
                              112 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                              33 responses
                              197 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Roy
                              by Roy
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                              84 responses
                              361 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post JimL
                              by JimL
                               
                              Working...
                              X