So what is this toxic masculinity thing anyhow?

[Cow Poke]

Once again, dummy.

Jimmy! I thought you were on vacation!!!

[Cow Poke]

You and Sparko are a regular Laurel and Hardy double act.

You realize that would be FOUR people, eh?

Now, how bout saying something really dumb and dramaqueenish....

Interesting that you feel the need to reinforce each others non-arguments rather than actually engage with your interlocutor . It is so obvious that you are unable. .

Thanks.

[Sparko]

You and Sparko are a regular Laurel and Hardy double act.

Interesting that you feel the need to reinforce each others non-arguments rather than actually engage with your interlocutor . It is so obvious that you are unable. .

You couldn't interlocute if your life depended on it, troll.

[Sparko]

Once again, dummy. There is

So you think it is OK for muslims to kill gays? wow. What about muslims blowing up people with bombs or running them down with trucks? That's OK too, right, because their morals say it is so.

Your idea of morality is nothing more than local laws Tassy. If it is legal to toss gays off of a bridge in Tassmeckistan, then it is legal, and if it is illegal here, then it is illegal. derp.

What happens if you disagree with a law, Tassman? What happens if they revoke Roe v Wade, for instance and it is then illegal to have an abortion? Does that mean that it is now immoral to have an abortion because our society says it is? Does that mean your morals will change too?

[Cow Poke]

You couldn't interlocute if your life depended on it, troll.

I don't know why, but that made me literally laugh out loud. And the boy thinks he's SO CLEVER.

[Tassman]

So you think it is OK for muslims to kill gays? wow. What about muslims blowing up people with bombs or running them down with trucks? That's OK too, right, because their morals say it is so.

Your idea of morality is nothing more than local laws Tassy.

So, what is your idea of morality, Sparko? Spell it out for us.

What happens if you disagree with a law, Tassman?

You seek community support in an attempt to change the existing law, this has happened throughout history. Obviously, it has. The laws we have today are quite different in many areas to the laws of our community 1 or 2 centuries ago.

What happens if they revoke Roe v Wade, for instance and it is then illegal to have an abortion? Does that mean that it is now immoral to have an abortion because our society says it is? Does that mean your morals will change too?

They demonstrably havehttps://eewc.com/evangelicals-open-d...iews-abortion/

[MaxVel]

your idea of morality, Sparko? Spell it out for us.



You seek community support in an attempt to change the existing law, this has happened throughout history. Obviously, it has. The laws we have today are quite different in many areas to the laws of our community 1 or 2 centuries ago.



They demonstrably havehttps://eewc.com/evangelicals-open-d...iews-abortion/

Six questions and you can only answer one. The only one that doesn't require you either change your position, or accept that you have no basis to critique other moral views. All the others you dodged.

No surprise. I pity you.

[Tassman]

Six questions and you can only answer one. The only one that doesn't require you either change your position, or accept that you have no basis to critique other moral views. All the others you dodged.

[MaxVel]

That load of nonsense has been thoroughly shown incoherent in the thread. Still can't answer the questions.

[Tassman]

That load of nonsense has been thoroughly shown incoherent in the thread. .

Nope, it hasn't.

[Sparko]

your idea of morality, Sparko? Spell it out for us.



You seek community support in an attempt to change the existing law, this has happened throughout history. Obviously, it has. The laws we have today are quite different in many areas to the laws of our community 1 or 2 centuries ago.



They demonstrably havehttps://eewc.com/evangelicals-open-d...iews-abortion/

So Tassman, do your morals flow with the law? If abortions are illegal where you are, do you then consider abortions immoral? No, you don't.

You have Phuket, Thailand as your part time location in your profile. Abortion except in the case of rape or the health of the mother is illegal in Thailand. The same in Sydney, with some additional parameters like "economic factors" . Yet you have been arguing for abortion to be a right for any reason up to when a fetus has "a brain" - You are at odds with your own societies. Yet you claim that morals are set by the society. By your own definition, your views on abortion are immoral.

[tabibito]

you claim that morals are set by the society. .

That's only 1 Tassman 4:6, please take the full statement into account, in context:

7 when I like them and particularly if they make Christianity look bad.

[Tassman]

So Tassman, do your morals flow with the law? If abortions are illegal where you are, do you then consider abortions immoral? No, you don't.

You have Phuket, Thailand as your part time location in your profile. Abortion except in the case of rape or the health of the mother is

http://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/2...l-may-thought/

The same in Sydney, with some additional parameters like "economic factors" . Yet you have been arguing for abortion to be a right for any reason up to when a fetus has "a brain"

https://www.fpnsw.org.au/sites/defau...bortion_fs.pdf

In practice this means abortion on demand. But, as in the most of the Western world, the vast majority of abortions occur in the first trimester.

- You are at odds with your own societies. Yet you claim that morals are set by the society. By your own definition, your views on abortion are immoral.

[Tassman]

That's only 1 Tassman 4:6, please take the full statement into account, in context:

7 when I like them and particularly if they make Christianity look bad.

Crass cynicism does not suit you, tabibito.

[Sparko]

http://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/2...l-may-thought/https://www.fpnsw.org.au/sites/defau...bortion_fs.pdf

Laws are based on social values Tassman. They are for the most part, legislating moral codes and values. And here you are showing that you don't agree with the law. You agree with "abortion on demand" even if it takes creating some loopholes in the law like the Doctor twisting the definition of health of the mother to mean "just wants an abortion"

again you argue for your own morality, and not that of your society which is codified by law. You can't keep your story straight.