Originally posted by One Bad Pig
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
So what is this toxic masculinity thing anyhow?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostTo me, this thread is basically:
Liberals: "The behavior of men in our society should be more Christ-like"
Some Conservatives: "We object to everything liberals say, on principle, therefore we disagree! Vehemently!!! This is part of the Librul Agenda!"
Some Conservatives: "We grew up with nasty behaviors being acceptable for men, therefore we're really upset that liberals want men to behave better! We loved it the way things were when men could be jerks! Women love it when men are jerks! It's biological nature for men to be jerks!"
Some Conservatives: "We grew up with the teaching that men should act Christ-like, so this suggestion that men should be Christ-like is stupid because we, personally, were already taught that! How dare anybody try to teach it, because we already were taught it! Dumb! Sad!"
Liberals: ~sigh~ ~face-palm~The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
I referenced some of the characyers in fiction that were used to represent behavior that was not acceptable.
Yusuke fighting Kuwabara is acceptable. The Toguro Brothers abuse of Yukina was not. Biff Tannen being a despotic abuser in another timeline was nightmarish. Kenshiro crying as he fougjt Raoh was heartbreaking considering Kenshiro had to fight his own adoptive brother to the death.
All of these stories deal with managing ones emotions and the consequences of ones actions. In none of these stories is the message that growing up requires one to supress their emotions. The point is that their is a time and a place for different emotions and actions.sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI'm hoping you're not thinking this is "Post of the Day" material."I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
"[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostThat's almost being unfair to strawmen. Starlight's post makes about as much sense as randomly declaring that the moon smells green.Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
Than a fool in the eyes of God
From "Fools Gold" by Petra
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostWell it should be as it saves people having to read the rest of the thread."The man from the yacht thought he was the first to find England; I thought I was the first to find Europe. I did try to found a heresy of my own; and when I had put the last touches to it, I discovered that it was orthodoxy."
GK Chesterton; Orthodoxy
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostWell it should be as it completely misrepresents the rest of the thread.Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostI'm hoping you're not thinking this is "Post of the Day" material.
To me, this thread is basically:
Proposal: "Toxic masculinity" is a mindset that emphasizes male traits to a destructive, abusive, harmful level.
Some conservatives: "Toxic masculinity" doesn't exist and is just another liberal label used to denigrate men (conservatives? Republicans?)
Some conservatives: "Toxic masculinity" is just a phrase that can be used to accuse any man of anything anytime, so it's meaningless.
Some conservatives: "Toxic masculinity" is just another word for "being a jerk" and we don't need the phrase. it's more harmful than beneficial.
I disagree with all of those positions in all of their forms. "Toxic masculinity" is real. If it were not, there would have been no #MeToo movement. If it were not, there would not be a network of women's shelters across the country. If it were not, women would earn as much as men for doing the same work and doing it just as well.
And my wife reminded me, last night, that it is not limited to male/female exchanges. She told this story from her childhood. When she was in middle school, an eighth grader (who was slight, and shy, and fearful) was being bullied by a sixth grader who outweighed him by 20+ pounds, and two of his friends. The child ran into his home to escape the bullies, and was met by his father. Upon realizing what was happening (the boy was in tears) he screamed, "get out there and fight them! No son of mine is going to be a sissy wimp!" and then shoved the boy back out the door. The boy stood sobbing on the front porch of the house. Even the bullies knew this was over the top, and slowly walked away.
Masculinity is defined as "qualities or attributes regarded as characteristic of men." Some men exaggerate those qualities and apply them in harmful and abusive ways. Yes - they are being jerks. But the term "toxic masculinity" simply defines what kind of jerk we're talking about. A bully is also a specific kind of jerk. A liar is another specific kind of jerk. There is nothing wrong with calling out a specific kind of "jerk" and talking about it.
No one (as far as I know) is calling all male actions "toxic." And it is true that the same action can be toxic or nontoxic depending on what motivates it. It is also true that telling someone else what motivates them is always a problem (though I have to admit that I find the objection on this front somewhat ironic, given the number of times I have been told what my motivations are on this site). Not all forms of "toxic masculinity" are created equal, as I noted. They can range from the more innocuous (e.g., opening the door for the "little woman,") to the more egregious (e.g., nothing the belt for each virgin bedded).
But ignoring the phenomenon seems to me a silly thing to do. And I have to admit that I do not understand the resistance to creating for a name for a thing we need to talk about, and become aware of.
ETA: And at the risk of being accused of "projection," I have found that having these discussions with my wife and others has made me aware of times when I have engaged in some form of "toxic masculinity." I've never engaged in the more egregious forms, but I have engaged in the more subtle forms. Having the conversation raised my awareness, and caused me to re-evaluate and change my behavior as a consequence. Personally, I think that's a good thing. I wish I could say I'm now perfect at it - but I'm not. Color me human.Last edited by carpedm9587; 01-31-2019, 08:32 AM.The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King
I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas
Comment
-
Originally posted by carpedm9587 View PostI disagree with all of those positions in all of their forms. "Toxic masculinity" is real. If it were not, there would have been no #MeToo movement. If it were not, there would not be a network of women's shelters across the country. If it were not, women would earn as much as men for doing the same work and doing it just as well.Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostThe fact is the majority of men would not fall under that label (depending on how you define it). None of the guys here would. And yes this term is being used to broad brush males.
I could go on - but I think you get the idea. There are stereotypes we all sometimes trip into without thinking. It doesn't make us "bad." It just means perhaps it deserves a bit of attention. If your answer to all of these (and any other possible questions) is "no," - then congratulations - you are apparently one of the males who has escaped any form of "toxic masculinity." I tend to think, given what I see in our culture, that such an animal is fairly rare. I DO think most men are decent and good and want to do the right thing. But we are all children of our culture and upbringing.The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy...returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars. Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Martin Luther King
I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong. Frederick Douglas
Comment
-
Originally posted by carpedm9587 View PostI suspect that most males have engaged in toxic masculinity to some degree - and most of us have probably engaged in the milder forms. So ask yourself, have you ever listened to a raunchy joke that demeans women without speaking up? Have you ever opened a door for a woman because she was a woman, rather than just doing it because she's another human being and you were being polite? If you are in a position to hire - have you ever selected a man for a position even though there was a woman equally or more qualified? Have you ever suggested to a son that "real men don't cry?" Have you ever called a woman politician "shrill" because she shouted but not called a male politician "shrill" when he does the same thing? Have you ever commented (or thought) about a female politician's choice of dress and not commented (or thought) about a male politician's choice of dress? Have you ever reacted differently to a male politician who cries in public than a female politician who does the same thing?Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s
Comment
-
Originally posted by seer View PostThe fact is the majority of men would not fall under that label (depending on how you define it). None of the guys here would. And yes this term is being used to broad brush males.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Starlight View PostWell it should be as it saves people having to read the rest of the thread.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Juvenal, Today, 02:50 PM
|
0 responses
7 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Juvenal
Today, 02:50 PM
|
||
Started by RumTumTugger, Today, 02:30 PM
|
0 responses
10 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by RumTumTugger
Today, 02:30 PM
|
||
Started by CivilDiscourse, Today, 12:07 PM
|
2 responses
26 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
Today, 12:57 PM
|
||
Started by Cow Poke, Yesterday, 03:46 PM
|
19 responses
219 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 12:33 PM
|
||
Started by Ronson, Yesterday, 01:52 PM
|
3 responses
44 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:12 PM
|
Comment