Originally posted by One Bad Pig
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
So what is this toxic masculinity thing anyhow?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postagain, with that definition then pedophilia is always a mental illness, which defeats your initial objection to us claiming that it is such. You just defeated your own argument.
Can you give me an example of when pedophilia or desires of such is NOT a mental illness?Last edited by Tassman; 05-08-2019, 12:36 AM.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostI have many times.
Any impairment of personal functioning that does NOT embody a risk of being acted upon is not usually categorized as a mental illness. This is true of any sexual desires...whether about children or S&M bondage or rape or any of the many sorts of sexual things people fantasize about, not least Evangelicals who are obsessed by internet porn at a disproportionately high rate. They may be ‘creeps’, or sinners or just bad people, but they are not considered mentally ill, although they may be helped by professional counselling.
And here is what you actually said:
Originally posted by Tassman View PostYour question betrays your ignorance. 'Mental disorders' are inextricably tied to behavior. A 'mental disorder' is a major disturbance or distress in thinking, feelings and behavior resulting in unacceptable behavior or disability or harm being caused in social situations or in the workplace. If they do not cause personal distress or disability and are not acted upon, they cannot be appropriately referred to as a mental disorder.
You are a moron.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostNo you haven't Mr. Gaslight.
2) Tassman seems to be in a tailspin to try to support dumb things he's said by attempting to change what he said.
It's like he doesn't know we can go back in time and produce the original stupid comment he made.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostA) That's Ox's line
2) Tassman seems to be in a tailspin to try to support dumb things he's said by attempting to change what he said.
It's like he doesn't know we can go back in time and produce the original stupid comment he made.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostThat's what I meant by "Mr. Gaslight" - he routinely changes his story and tries to convince people that was what he said all along, changing reality. As if we can't just go back and read what he wrote ourselves.
Tassman is spayshul!The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostDefine what you mean by mental disorder.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JimL View PostSeems you have very little resistance to temptation, CP.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostActually, I resisted, Jim! There were so many possible responses, but I resisted.Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist
Comment
-
Originally posted by One Bad Pig View PostGotta give him points for trying. He's so gosh darned CUTE when he does that.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Post
So again, if you have two people who have not acted upon their desires for sex with children, then according to your definition (which you still did not cite a source for) the guy who is distressed by his thoughts and seeks therapy is mentally ill, while the guy who enjoys his desires but still hasn't acted upon them is not mentally ill. At least not until he acts upon those desires.“He felt that his whole life was a kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.” - Douglas Adams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tassman View PostYou keep repeating this nonsense but that’s not the argument. Your: “still hasn't acted upon them” implies that he is at risk of “acting upon them” in which case he has a mental illness, as I’ve said. The same applies to ANY sort of obsessive sexual desires.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Today, 01:12 PM
|
4 responses
50 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sparko
Today, 02:38 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, Yesterday, 09:33 AM
|
45 responses
333 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by Starlight
Today, 05:05 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-16-2024, 10:43 PM
|
60 responses
386 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seanD
Today, 03:09 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
|
0 responses
27 views
1 like
|
Last Post
by rogue06
04-16-2024, 09:38 AM
|
||
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 04-16-2024, 06:47 AM
|
100 responses
437 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 12:45 PM |
Comment