Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

How NUTTY Can the Liberals Get??? Ban He / She?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How NUTTY Can the Liberals Get??? Ban He / She?

    Just when you thought the liberals couldn't get any NUTTIER, we have this...

    Dem. Senator Bans ‘He/She’ Pronouns During Legislative Hearings

    KBS_8796-1210x642.jpg

    California State Senate Judiciary Committee chairwoman Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) announced Thursday that only “gender neutral” pronouns will be permitted during committee hearings. No more will Sen. Jackson allow “he” or “she” to be used when referring to a male or female; “they” will be the only allowed pronoun.

    Acknowledging this incorrect grammar, Jackson said since California passed a law recognizing the non-binary designation as a gender, “he and she, we are now merging them so we are using what my grammar teacher would have had a heart attack over: we are using the phrase ‘they’ and replacing other designations so it’s a gender neutral designation.”

    “In the spirit of gender neutrality for the rules of this committee, we now designate the chair as ‘they,’” Jackson said, referring to herself as “they.” Or should we say “oneself,” referring to a gender neutral subject with a reflexive pronoun? And isn’t Sen. Jackson a “chairwoman” and not a “chair?”

    As silly as this sounds, Sen. Jackson has the authority to make this change. Pursuant to the California Constitution, the Legislature has authority to do what they want for their committee rules.


    SHE is a NUTCASE!!!
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2

    Comment


    • #3
      It's nothing new in the Land of Fruits and Nuts....

      California crazy: Calling a 'he-she' a 'he' can now get you jailed (From Oct 2017)

      California_Giant_Tunnels_45308.jpg-ec890_c0-0-3000-1749_s885x516.jpg

      It’s madness in California, as Gov. Jerry Brown, a Democrat, of course, just signed into law a bill that creates special rights for LGBT senior-age adults in long-term nursing care that requires them to be referred to by their gender pronouns of choice.

      Those who don’t? It’s off to jail they go. Free speech, anyone?

      At the least, violators could be forced to pay up to $1,000 in fines.

      Technically, it’s called the “Bill of Rights” for seniors, and it came into law as Senate Bill 219 on the backs of Sen. Scott Weiner, a San Francisco Democrat, and the group, Equality California.

      But more to truth, it’s a Madness Law, one that opens the door for silly transgender activists to demand they be referred to as they choose — a he as a she, a she as a he, and so forth and so on, until confusion abounds and sex assignments are ingrained into society as matters of individual choice, not God’s doing. What a load of deceit.

      And the end game, of course, is the destruction of the traditional family.

      Once again, it’s all being sold as a social justice endeavor — a human right.

      “Our LGBT seniors built the modern LGBT community and led the fight for so many of the rights our community takes for granted today,” Weiner said, LGBT Weekly reported. “It is our duty to make sure they can age with the dignity and respect they deserve.”

      So what that means is caretakers in long-term living facilities who “willfully and repeatedly” refuse to use a transgender resident’s preferred pronoun or name can be fined up to $1,000 or sent to prison for up to a year, the Daily Caller noted, citing the California Health and Safety Code.

      The new provision also means LGBTs can use whatever bathroom they want at the care facility — no matter which one corresponds to their biological sex.

      Tearing down the family, one new LGBT special right at a time.

      But jail time?

      So let’s get this straight: It’s OK by society to sling about the f-word and the n-word — it’s OK by both leftist standards and the First Amendment to use baseball bats and Molotov cocktails against those who support President Donald Trump, Robert E. Lee statues and the Confederate flag. But calling a man a she and a woman a he — that’s jail worthy?

      Seems like California’s headed to a face-off between LGBT loons and those who’ve heard of the concept of freedom of speech.

      Just because the governor signed on to this madness doesn’t make it legal.
      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

      Comment


      • #4
        From your title, I got the impression that someone was up in arms over "banshee" and wanted to replace it with "banhee".


        Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

        Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
        sigpic
        I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

        Comment


        • #5
          Why are we shocked that the left is insane?
          Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

          Comment


          • #6
            How nutty can the left get? Does squirrel poop ring a bell?
            That's what
            - She

            Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
            - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

            I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
            - Stephen R. Donaldson

            Comment


            • #7
              And more.....

              California Senate Bill SB-179 would delete the requirement for somebody in California seeking a new birth certificate to be required to prove their gender change, and simply declare the gender identity of their choice from "female, male or nonbinary".
              This bill would enact the Gender Recognition Act. For purposes of obtaining a new birth certificate under the provisions above, the bill would delete the requirement that an applicant have undergone any treatment, and instead would authorize a person to submit to the State Registrar an application to change gender on the birth certificate and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that the request for a change of gender is to conform the person’s legal gender to the person’s gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the change of gender on a new birth certificate to be female, male, or nonbinary.

              Further, it requires that California DMV issue driver's licenses showing the gender identity the driver chooses, again, "female, male or nonbinary".
              This bill, on January 1, 2019, would require an applicant for an original driver’s license or renewal of a driver’s license to choose a gender category of female, male, or nonbinary, as specified, and would require the department to adopt regulations to provide a process for an amendment to a gender category under these provisions. The bill would also require the enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry to instead require an applicant to mark his or her gender.

              ETA: From what I can tell, this is now California Law.



              In a bit of irony, one of its sponsors is a wiener. Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco)
              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by seer View Post
                Why are we shocked that the left is insane?
                Not shocked by any stretch of the imagination.
                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Liberals cluck their tongues about "settled science" when it comes to a controversial issue like global warming, but not when it has to do with the biology one is born with.
                  Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                  But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                  Than a fool in the eyes of God


                  From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                    Liberals cluck their tongues about "settled science" when it comes to a controversial issue like global warming, but not when it has to do with the biology one is born with.
                    Same with abortion. Science be damned!!!
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                      Not shocked by any stretch of the imagination.
                      I would see this as a free speech issue, how does she get to limit or define speech for the other legislators?
                      Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

                      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
                        And more.....

                        California Senate Bill SB-179 would delete the requirement for somebody in California seeking a new birth certificate to be required to prove their gender change, and simply declare the gender identity of their choice from "female, male or nonbinary".
                        This bill would enact the Gender Recognition Act. For purposes of obtaining a new birth certificate under the provisions above, the bill would delete the requirement that an applicant have undergone any treatment, and instead would authorize a person to submit to the State Registrar an application to change gender on the birth certificate and an affidavit attesting, under penalty of perjury, that the request for a change of gender is to conform the person’s legal gender to the person’s gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. By requiring the affidavit to be attested to under penalty of perjury, the bill would create a crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize the change of gender on a new birth certificate to be female, male, or nonbinary.

                        Further, it requires that California DMV issue driver's licenses showing the gender identity the driver chooses, again, "female, male or nonbinary".
                        This bill, on January 1, 2019, would require an applicant for an original driver’s license or renewal of a driver’s license to choose a gender category of female, male, or nonbinary, as specified, and would require the department to adopt regulations to provide a process for an amendment to a gender category under these provisions. The bill would also require the enrollment form for the California Organ and Tissue Donor Registry to instead require an applicant to mark his or her gender.

                        ETA: From what I can tell, this is now California Law.



                        In a bit of irony, one of its sponsors is a wiener. Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco)
                        I am wondering when they have to deal with putting men into women's prisons and vice versa because of this nonsense. Or will they just have co-ed prisons?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by seer View Post
                          I would see this as a free speech issue, how does she get to limit or define speech for the other legislators?
                          That is EGGzackly the challenge!
                          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Sparko View Post
                            I am wondering when they have to deal with putting men into women's prisons and vice versa because of this nonsense. Or will they just have co-ed prisons?
                            Co-ed prisons would not at all surprise me.
                            Enter the Church and wash away your sins. For here there is a hospital and not a court of law. Do not be ashamed to enter the Church; be ashamed when you sin, but not when you repent. – St. John Chrysostom

                            Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
                            sigpic
                            I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              If there is a really nutty way to screw up society in general, the liberals will find it.
                              The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                              Comment

                              Related Threads

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by little_monkey, 03-27-2024, 04:19 PM
                              16 responses
                              157 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post One Bad Pig  
                              Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                              53 responses
                              400 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Mountain Man  
                              Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                              25 responses
                              114 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post rogue06
                              by rogue06
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                              33 responses
                              198 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post Roy
                              by Roy
                               
                              Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                              84 responses
                              373 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post JimL
                              by JimL
                               
                              Working...
                              X