Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

McCabe: There were 25th Amendment discussions at DOJ to remove Trump from office

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
    The phrase "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office" has a very specific meaning.
    Not quite. It could mean the president is literally physically incapable of doing anything, or it could mean that they're seen as a really really bad leader and thus are unable to do so due to incompetence. In any event, the definition is actually irrelevant--all that the Amendment requires is that the required individuals make a written declaration that they view the president as being unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Terraceth View Post
      Not quite. It could mean the president is literally physically incapable of doing anything, or it could mean that they're seen as a really really bad leader and thus are unable to do so due to incompetence. In any event, the definition is actually irrelevant--all that the Amendment requires is that the required individuals make a written declaration that they view the president as being unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
      Who is the "they?" Certainly not political hacks in the Dept. of Justice, that was an attempted coup.
      Atheism is the cult of death, the death of hope. The universe is doomed, you are doomed, the only thing that remains is to await your execution...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbnueb2OI4o&t=3s

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Terraceth View Post
        Not quite. It could mean the president is literally physically incapable of doing anything, or it could mean that they're seen as a really really bad leader and thus are unable to do so due to incompetence. In any event, the definition is actually irrelevant--all that the Amendment requires is that the required individuals make a written declaration that they view the president as being unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.
        For context, the 25th Amendment was drafted and passed following the assassination of John F. Kennedy and therefore invites a narrow interpretation. Invoking the 25th Amendment simply out of political expediency is clearly contrary to its intent.
        Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
        But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
        Than a fool in the eyes of God


        From "Fools Gold" by Petra

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Starlight View Post
          You know that it would be his cabinet ditching him right? And that they're conservatives not liberals?
          It's the liberals who want him gone - and they're hoping the conservatives are stupid enough to play along. So far, not.
          The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by seer View Post
            Who is the "they?" Certainly not political hacks in the Dept. of Justice, that was an attempted coup.
            "In any event, the definition is actually irrelevant--all that the Amendment requires is that the required individuals make a written declaration that they view the president as being unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

            The "they" quite clearly refers to the "required individuals" mentioned earlier in the sentence. If you're confused as to what I meant by "required individuals," I am referring to "the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide" as specified in the Amendment.

            Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
            For context, the 25th Amendment was drafted and passed following the assassination of John F. Kennedy and therefore invites a narrow interpretation. Invoking the 25th Amendment simply out of political expediency is clearly contrary to its intent.
            Whatever the intent was, the text is clear. All that is required is the transmission in writing of "the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide" (and, should the president object, also 2/3 of each house of congress). That's the plain and unambiguous text of the Amendment. That's exactly why the requirements are so steep (even steeper than impeachment, in fact): To make sure that there's wide agreement that the president needs to be replaced.
            Last edited by Terraceth; 02-15-2019, 06:20 PM.

            Comment


            • #21
              William Barr’s son-in-law is now a Trump legal adviser. How convenient is that? A nice little back-channel for the conspirators helping to cover up Putin’s control of US foreign policy.
              “I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
              “And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
              “not all there” - you know who you are

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                William Barr’s son-in-law is now a Trump legal adviser.
                Jobs for everyone's relatives!

                If the swamp overflows, that basically counts as "drained" right?
                "I hate him passionately", he's "a demonic force" - Tucker Carlson, in private, on Donald Trump
                "Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism" - George Orwell
                "[Capitalism] as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of evils. I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy" - Albert Einstein

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by firstfloor View Post
                  William Barr’s son-in-law is now a Trump legal adviser. How convenient is that? A nice little back-channel for the conspirators helping to cover up Putin’s control of US foreign policy.
                  Considering he has worked for the justice department for quite some time, and is being reassigned from the US Attorney's office with direct access and reporting to the AG to the White House where the reporting line is much less direct. He also has not been assigned to the team responsible for defending the President in the special counsel’s probe.
                  That's what
                  - She

                  Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
                  - Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)

                  I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
                  - Stephen R. Donaldson

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Bill the Cat View Post
                    Considering he has worked for the justice department for quite some time, and is being reassigned from the US Attorney's office with direct access and reporting to the AG to the White House where the reporting line is much less direct. He also has not been assigned to the team responsible for defending the President in the special counsel’s probe.
                    These guys were also pitching fits when the Obama administration doled out web design for the spectacularly expensive Obamacare website and solar jobs and cash to their supporters, right?
                    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                    Comment

                    Related Threads

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 02:07 PM
                    44 responses
                    244 views
                    2 likes
                    Last Post seer
                    by seer
                     
                    Started by Starlight, Yesterday, 12:34 AM
                    11 responses
                    86 views
                    2 likes
                    Last Post rogue06
                    by rogue06
                     
                    Started by carpedm9587, 04-13-2024, 07:51 PM
                    31 responses
                    177 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post rogue06
                    by rogue06
                     
                    Started by Juvenal, 04-13-2024, 04:39 PM
                    42 responses
                    302 views
                    0 likes
                    Last Post Starlight  
                    Started by carpedm9587, 04-12-2024, 01:47 PM
                    165 responses
                    781 views
                    1 like
                    Last Post Sam
                    by Sam
                     
                    Working...
                    X