7 archangels, 7 virtues, 7 octaves, primary colors, 22 verses referring to 7

[Faber]

But in Hebrew and Aramaic, 666 = WWW. Does that mean the internet is a tool of Satan?

We're all DOOMED!!!

[rogue06]

That's some pretty loony graphics ya got there.

I've seen better from Bible Code advocates

[Sparko]

But in Hebrew and Aramaic, 666 = WWW. Does that mean the internet is a tool of Satan?

We're all DOOMED!!!

Well that explains facebook then.

[rogue06]

5 seen in michelangelo's painting.

That's Da Vinci and shouldn't there be another three points in that?

00000000000000aaa1.jpg

[JohnHermes]

[Sparko]

So now they are just adding random lines to the drawing to come up with different symbols? LOL

You realize this was just Da Vinci doing anatomical studies of the human body proportions and movement, right? Nothing to do with religion.


The Vitruvian Man (Italian: Le proporzioni del corpo umano secondo Vitruvio, which is translated to "The proportions of the human body according to Vitruvius"), or simply L'Uomo Vitruviano (Italian pronunciation: [ˈlwɔːmo vitruˈvjaːno]), is a drawing made by the Italian polymath Leonardo da Vinci around 1490.[1] It is accompanied by notes based on the work of the architect Vitruvius. The drawing, which is in ink on paper, depicts a man in two superimposed positions with his arms and legs apart and inscribed in a circle and square. The drawing and text are sometimes called the Canon of Proportions or, less often, Proportions of Man. It is kept in the Gabinetto dei disegni e stampe of the Gallerie dell'Accademia, in Venice, Italy, under reference 228. Like most works on paper, it is displayed to the public only occasionally, so it is not part of the normal exhibition of the museum.[2][3]

The drawing is based on the correlations of ideal human body proportions with geometry described by the ancient Roman architect Vitruvius in Book III of his treatise De architectura. Vitruvius described the human figure as being the principal source of proportion among the classical orders of architecture. Vitruvius determined that the ideal body should be eight heads high. Leonardo's drawing is traditionally named in honor of the architect.

[JohnHermes]

Anatomy and theology in an an esoteric view go hand in hand. A lot of parables pertaining to astrotheology which includes the anatomical reflecting the astrological (like the 12 human cranial nerves representing the 12 zodiacs) . The 2nd hermetic principles as "As above So Below" which is seen throughout nature. Numbers, geometry are hand in hand connected with conscious archetypes of personality. A lot of these artists had esoteric insight and love to speak in parables. Artists and their poetry, whether it's writing or art.

I believe he was portraying the ultimate man, Adam Kadmon of the Old Testament.



https://betweenthepillars.wordpress....many-meanings/





T

https://gnosticteachings.org/courses...smic-star.html

[Sparko]

Anatomy and theology in an an esoteric view go hand in hand. A lot of parables pertaining to astrotheology which includes the anatomical reflecting the astrological (like the 12 human cranial nerves representing the 12 zodiacs) . The 2nd hermetic principles as "As above So Below" which is seen throughout nature. Numbers, geometry are hand in hand connected with conscious archetypes of personality. A lot of these artists had esoteric insight and love to speak in parables. Artists and their poetry, whether it's writing or art.

I believe he was portraying the ultimate man, Adam Kadmon of the Old Testament.



https://betweenthepillars.wordpress....many-meanings/





T

https://gnosticteachings.org/courses...smic-star.html

You really need to add your own ideas and thoughts to a post and not just post quotes from other places. We have a rule about that.

Debates (points for your position) made via weblink are not allowed. Weblinks may be used when a substantive summary of the point being made is posted on the board with a link given for further information regarding your position. Remember responsive arguments are to be as personal as possible, not "cut and paste" dueling articles. This can be avoided by giving one's personal analysis along with an article, or just quoting the specifically relevant portions and showing relevance. An exception is granted for articles or other larger pieces posted to start a thread which may be posted in accordance with our copyright rules without further commentary from the thread starter.

[JohnHermes]

No worries! Explain my point of view, and leave links that has more info (if need be).

[Sparko]

No worries! Explain my point of view, and leave links that has more info (if need be).

Thanks!

[JonathanL]

Thanks!

No, you don't understand. He's asking you to explain his point of view, for him and for you to provide the links.

[Sparko]

No, you don't understand. He's asking you to explain his point of view, for him and for you to provide the links.

How would that work?

[JonathanL]

How would that work?

Mindreading.

[Sparko]

Mindreading.

He really doesn't want me to explain his point of view or mind read him. ask Carp.

[JohnHermes]

Paradox valley lol