Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

IG's FISA Probe May Hamper Dems' Impeachment Plans

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
    If Mueller does try to deny it, you can be sure that Barr will set the record straight.

    You need not fear the truth, Jimmy
    That's just stupid logic, MM. Ask yourself; why would Mueller say it and then deny that he said it. Use your birdbrain! What Mueller actually said, what he put down in writing, contradicts what Barr claims he said after the fact. Don't be so willfully stupid, it makes you look actually stupid.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
      ...why would Mueller say it and then deny that he said it.
      And since Mueller knows Barr has him on record, he doesn't dare deny it.

      But just for fun, why don't you try explaining in what way Barr's letter to Congress contradicted Mueller's report. Please be specific.
      Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
      But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
      Than a fool in the eyes of God


      From "Fools Gold" by Petra

      Comment


      • Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
        Hey dumbell, Mueller said this: The Atty Gen's summary did not capture the context, nature, or substance of the special councils work.
        What Mueller actually said:

        "The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions."

        Which is to say that Barr did "capture the context, nature, and substance" of Mueller's report, he just didn't capture it as fully as Mueller would have liked, which is why Mueller later emphasized to Barr directly that he was not accusing the attorney general of being inaccurate or misleading.
        Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
        But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
        Than a fool in the eyes of God


        From "Fools Gold" by Petra

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
          And since Mueller knows Barr has him on record, he doesn't dare deny it.
          The point is going over your head. For what possible reason would Mueller deny what he told Barr? You're not making sense, as usual!
          But just for fun, why don't you try explaining in what way Barr's letter to Congress contradicted Mueller's report. Please be specific.
          For one thing, it's right there in the reply Mueller made to Barr's public summary. It didn't fully capture the context, nature, or substance of the special councils work and conclusions. Try, if you can, and think about those words MM, what they mean. Second, Mueller's report did not exonerate the president or his administration, and he reported multiple instances of obstruction on the part of the president. And if you weren't so dumb, you would see that the obstruction and cover-up is ongoing still. But I don't ever expect that to sink into that thick skull of yours.
          Last edited by JimL; 05-26-2019, 05:10 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JimL View Post
            The point is going over your head.
            Your such a blessing, Jimmy. Please dont ever chainge.
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
              Your such a blessing, Jimmy. Please dont ever chainge.
              It's you're, CP, not your.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
                It's you're, CP, not your.
                That was the only (probably deliberate) mistake you caught?

                Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                Than a fool in the eyes of God


                From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                Comment


                • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                  The point is going over your head. For what possible reason would Mueller deny what he told Barr? You're not making sense, as usual!

                  For one thing, it's right there in the reply Mueller made to Barr's public summary. It didn't fully capture the context, nature, or substance of the special councils work and conclusions. Try, if you can, and think about those words MM, what they mean. Second, Mueller's report did not exonerate the president or his administration, and he reported multiple instances of obstruction on the part of the president. And if you weren't so dumb, you would see that the obstruction and cover-up is ongoing still. But I don't ever expect that to sink into that thick skull of yours.
                  Your failure to present any specific discrepancies between Barr's letter and Mueller's report is noted.

                  As far as Mueller not exonerating Trump, so what? He's a prosecutor. They don't have the authority to issue an exoneration because everyone is assumed innocent until proven otherwise, and if a person is never charged with a crime in the first place then there's nothing to be exonerated from.

                  As I've said before, if a prosecutor stands before a judge and says, "Your honor, I can not conclude that the defendant committed any crimes, but I can't exonerate him either," the next words out of the judge's mouth will be "Not guilty."
                  Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                  But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                  Than a fool in the eyes of God


                  From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                    Your failure to present any specific discrepancies between Barr's letter and Mueller's report is noted.

                    As far as Mueller not exonerating Trump, so what? He's a prosecutor. They don't have the authority to issue an exoneration because everyone is assumed innocent until proven otherwise, and if a person is never charged with a crime in the first place then there's nothing to be exonerated from.

                    As I've said before, if a prosecutor stands before a judge and says, "Your honor, I can not conclude that the defendant committed any crimes, but I can't exonerate him either," the next words out of the judge's mouth will be "Not guilty."
                    You already know why Mueller didn't indict, so please stop acting the ignoramus. You are acting aren't you?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mountain Man View Post
                      That was the only (probably deliberate) mistake you caught?

                      I tried to make it REALLY simple for him.
                      The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by JimL View Post
                        You already know why Mueller didn't indict, so please stop acting the ignoramus. You are acting aren't you?
                        Yup. Lack of a case.

                        I'm always still in trouble again

                        "You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
                        "Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
                        "Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by rogue06 View Post
                          Yup. Lack of a case.
                          You didn't read the report, did you rogue?

                          Comment


                          • Near as I can tell, the investigation was founded on fake documents implicating Trump in nefarious activities, which was stated in the investigation's own findings. In short, someone tried to frame Trump, and it back-fired. I don't know if the investigation found that some of the media were complicit in attempting to frame Trump, but many of the some's own reports make it difficult to believe otherwise.
                            1Cor 15:34 Come to your senses as you ought and stop sinning; for I say to your shame, there are some who know not God.
                            .
                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛
                            Scripture before Tradition:
                            but that won't prevent others from
                            taking it upon themselves to deprive you
                            of the right to call yourself Christian.

                            ⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛⊛

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by JimLamebrain View Post
                              You didn't read the report, did you rogue?
                              My favorite was the part when Mueller said that he couldn't conclude that the President had committed a crime. Which part did you like?
                              Some may call me foolish, and some may call me odd
                              But I'd rather be a fool in the eyes of man
                              Than a fool in the eyes of God


                              From "Fools Gold" by Petra

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by tabibito View Post
                                Near as I can tell, the investigation was founded on fake documents...
                                An honorable judge would declare that resulting information is "fruit from the poisonous tree" and toss it out.
                                The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                                Comment

                                Related Threads

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by little_monkey, Yesterday, 04:19 PM
                                6 responses
                                45 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post whag
                                by whag
                                 
                                Started by whag, 03-26-2024, 04:38 PM
                                42 responses
                                231 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post whag
                                by whag
                                 
                                Started by rogue06, 03-26-2024, 11:45 AM
                                24 responses
                                104 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Ronson
                                by Ronson
                                 
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 09:21 AM
                                32 responses
                                176 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, 03-26-2024, 08:34 AM
                                73 responses
                                299 views
                                0 likes
                                Last Post Hypatia_Alexandria  
                                Working...
                                X