Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 82

Thread: Can a Sitting President be Indicted?

  1. #21
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    51,871
    Amen (Given)
    11242
    Amen (Received)
    24004
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    OLC Policies are organizational rules to be followed by Justice Dept. employees which Mueller is one. Or do you think the OLC has these rules just for the fun of it?
    I saw you were typing something really dumb, so I posted my response at the very same moment.
    I have called you my friends.... Jesus
    Jn 15:15

  2. #22
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    12,464
    Amen (Given)
    1559
    Amen (Received)
    1427
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    And, of course, a "policy" is enforced by the body that enacted it, and can be changed, amended, suspended or revoked at any time for any reason by the body.
    But it wasn't changed, was it? Which means Mueller was bound by it.

  3. #23
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    51,871
    Amen (Given)
    11242
    Amen (Received)
    24004
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    But it wasn't changed, was it? Which means Mueller was bound by it.
    Laws are binding, Jim. Policies, not so much. So, no, Mueller is not bound by a policy.
    I have called you my friends.... Jesus
    Jn 15:15

  4. #24
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    48,045
    Amen (Given)
    4778
    Amen (Received)
    21247
    OK JimL, please city the policy that Mueller was bound by. And provide a link.


  5. #25
    tWebber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Agnostic
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    12,464
    Amen (Given)
    1559
    Amen (Received)
    1427
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
    OK JimL, please city the policy that Mueller was bound by. And provide a link.

    In 1973 the OLC concluded that the indictment of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of said president to perform his constitutional assigned duties and would thus violate constitutional separation of powers. The view of the DOJ remains that the President is immune from indictment, and that is the OLC rule under which Mueller was operating.

  6. #26
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    51,871
    Amen (Given)
    11242
    Amen (Received)
    24004
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    In 1973 the OLC concluded that the indictment of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of said president to perform his constitutional assigned duties and would thus violate constitutional separation of powers. The view of the DOJ remains that the President is immune from indictment, and that is the OLC rule under which Mueller was operating.
    He asked for a link. Since you failed to provide one, I'll offer this as a possible source, just because I'm such a nice guy.

    An astute person person would recognize that this is an opinion for a policy, not a law.
    An honest person would admit there's a big difference between a policy and a law.
    I have called you my friends.... Jesus
    Jn 15:15

  7. #27
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    48,045
    Amen (Given)
    4778
    Amen (Received)
    21247
    Quote Originally Posted by JimL View Post
    In 1973 the OLC concluded that the indictment of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of said president to perform his constitutional assigned duties and would thus violate constitutional separation of powers. The view of the DOJ remains that the President is immune from indictment, and that is the OLC rule under which Mueller was operating.
    Thanks. but a link would be nice.

    And it wasn't an OLC rule. It was an legal opinion. An opinion. It isn't policy. or law.

    I found this:

    https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/olc..._president.htm
    ---
    In 1973, the Department of Justice concluded that the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned duties, and would thus violate the constitutional separation of powers. No court has addressed this question directly, but the judicial precedents that bear on the continuing validity of our constitutional analysis are consistent with both the analytic approach taken and the conclusions reached. Our view remains that a sitting President is constitutionally immune from indictment and criminal prosecution.


    Randolph D. Moss
    Assistant Attorney General
    Office of Legal Counsel

  8. #28
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    51,871
    Amen (Given)
    11242
    Amen (Received)
    24004
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
    Thanks. but a link would be nice.

    And it wasn't an OLC rule. It was an legal opinion. An opinion. It isn't policy. or law.

    I found this:

    https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/olc..._president.htm
    ---
    In 1973, the Department of Justice concluded that the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unduly interfere with the ability of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned duties, and would thus violate the constitutional separation of powers. No court has addressed this question directly, but the judicial precedents that bear on the continuing validity of our constitutional analysis are consistent with both the analytic approach taken and the conclusions reached. Our view remains that a sitting President is constitutionally immune from indictment and criminal prosecution.


    Randolph D. Moss
    Assistant Attorney General
    Office of Legal Counsel
    And that source is cited on the DOJ website as an OPINION....
    I have called you my friends.... Jesus
    Jn 15:15

  9. #29
    Troll Magnet Sparko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    48,045
    Amen (Given)
    4778
    Amen (Received)
    21247
    Quote Originally Posted by Cow Poke View Post
    And that source is cited on the DOJ website as an OPINION....
    tha's what I said.

    JimL has no idea the difference between an opinion, a policy, and law.

    It has never been tested.

  10. #30
    See, the Thing is... Cow Poke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Faith
    Christian
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    51,871
    Amen (Given)
    11242
    Amen (Received)
    24004
    Meanwhile, I think Trump is trying to goad the Democrats in to impeaching him.
    I have called you my friends.... Jesus
    Jn 15:15

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •