Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

See more
See less

The Johannine Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Johannine Question

    NT scholar Mark Goodacre presented a very brief video on John's use of the synoptics. Goodacre stated that John "creatively embellishes"; "adds new characters and discourses", engaging in "imaginative retelling".

    He goes on to state that throughout much of Christian history GJohn was regarded as a kind of reflection or meditation on the synoptics, which seems to include ahistorical or theological material. OK, so, that seems to be the academic/critical position in a nutshell. Now, I have a question for my Catholic and Orthodox friends:

    Is there an official position on GJohn, or are there a plurality of perspectives on GJohn within Orthodoxy and Catholicism? If there is an official position on GJohn, does it line up with the critical/academic position as laid out by Mark Goodacre?

    Thank you.

  • #2
    The only official Orthodox positions are those declared by ecumenical councils, so no. If you want the traditional view of John's gospel, read Eusebius.

    Your holding up of Goodacre's view as the academic/critical position is a whole 'nother question. I have no idea on what he bases his assertion regarding the general view of the gospel throughout Christian history, though I rather suspect it does not reflect Orthodox views throughout Christian history.
    Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
    sigpic
    I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Scrawly View Post
      NT scholar Mark Goodacre presented a very brief video on John's use of the synoptics. Goodacre stated that John "creatively embellishes"; "adds new characters and discourses", engaging in "imaginative retelling".

      He goes on to state that throughout much of Christian history GJohn was regarded as a kind of reflection or meditation on the synoptics, which seems to include ahistorical or theological material. OK, so, that seems to be the academic/critical position in a nutshell. Now, I have a question for my Catholic and Orthodox friends:

      Is there an official position on GJohn, or are there a plurality of perspectives on GJohn within Orthodoxy and Catholicism? If there is an official position on GJohn, does it line up with the critical/academic position as laid out by Mark Goodacre?

      Thank you.

      Comment

      Related Threads

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by Thoughtful Monk, 04-14-2024, 04:34 PM
      4 responses
      39 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Christianbookworm  
      Started by One Bad Pig, 04-10-2024, 12:35 PM
      0 responses
      28 views
      1 like
      Last Post One Bad Pig  
      Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
      35 responses
      184 views
      0 likes
      Last Post Cow Poke  
      Started by NorrinRadd, 04-13-2022, 12:54 AM
      45 responses
      342 views
      0 likes
      Last Post NorrinRadd  
      Started by Zymologist, 07-09-2019, 01:18 PM
      367 responses
      17,331 views
      0 likes
      Last Post rogue06
      by rogue06
       
      Working...
      X